Saturday, May 28, 2016
F: 8:20 a.m. Round three. In this corner, still punching, the representative of 3D. And in your corner, Miss Rita?
R: I’m in your corner. We’re not only “all in this together,” in a sense there is only one of us, so who does that leave to be in the opposite corner?
The point, as you gathered, is that everything – hence, every body, and everybody – interconnect. We’re all one thing, and that doesn’t mean only all humans. But since “al is one” doesn’t give much to chew on, we are in the habit of considering relative divisions. Indeed, that is a prime attribute and purpose of 3D, to give greater definition to what are only relative differences.
So now look at the three interrelated parts we have been considering and, remembering that we are all one and that time and space are (among other things) for the purpose of exaggerating distinctions, tell me how you see things now.
F: All right. I don’t see anything to invalidate the multiplex cinema – or rather multiplex-virtual-reality-theater – analogy. I see 3D life – each soul – as relatively separate in that each has its own reality-program it is interacting with, but absolutely interconnected because tied back to the same non-3D larger being of which they were created. I see each life with its own possibilities and constrictions, enriched by the conscious and / or (usually) unconscious inter-connections between lives. And I see each soul’s starting-place independent from any other soul’s activity, so that it isn’t exactly a matter of life taking up where another left off, but more like each one being created by the larger being for the purpose and according to specs known to the larger being but not necessarily to any of the souls involved. That’s about as far as I can get.
R: Very well. Not wrong as far as it goes. There are many aspects of the situation not yet considered – as, for instance, what is meant by someone experiencing a “last life” in a series. That leaves open the question of the relative separation of souls within the overall unity of the larger being.
F: And if I’m not mistaken, we’ve been told that the many larger beings in turn form part of a yet larger being.
R: Which is beyond our observation, but as above, so below.
F: Enough for now?
R: Enough, and I think we should both be very pleased with ourselves. You will see, looking back, that the process got you renewed mental energy that kept you going and therefore allowed me continued access.
F: We don’t usually think of it that way. We usually think of access as going from 3D to non-3D.
R: Well, now you know to take a look at that assumption.
F: All right. It’s getting toward nine o-clock, and it will be a while before I get all this typed in and sent. Thanks for all of it, and I imagine there will be follow-up questions, objections, etc.
R: That’s what we’re here for.
F: Yes it is. Okay, till next time.