TGU

Thursday, August 26, 2010

5:30 AM. Ready.

Now suppose that you consider each trait you can identify within your person-group to be a person-group in itself. Where does this place you?

I’ve been trying to imagine. So — pray continue.

In your work with “robots” or in any healing work involving mobilizing the unconscious mind of the person you’re working with, you have been led to act “as if” the shoulder, say, or the knee, or the nervous system, or whatever, were a separate consciousness of limited intelligence acting for the good of the whole as it understood the good (which misunderstanding often causes the trouble, or anyway expresses it). You probably don’t quite remember that this approach originally “came to you” as an innate knowing. In any case you have developed a system out of your experience at contacting parts of your bodies and communicating with them.

Continue reading Conversations August 26, 2010

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

6:30 AM. Life between entries is becoming more or less a blank, accomplishing most necessary things — not all — and waiting for the next session. Very aware of not working.

Okay, proceed. Tempted to say, “chastise away,” but don’t want to interrupt the flow of such good material.

The next analogy to consider is at a lower level. Just as it is true that a person-group may be considered one thread of a larger organism, [which is] a person-group of its own, so it is true that each thread — each trait — of your own may be considered a person-group of its own at a lower level. And of course all of this will need to be spelled out — or hinted at, really, as we must proceed mostly by analogy. It remains true that we are attempting to convey information that cannot be expressed directly in words.

Continue reading Conversations August 25, 2010