Hemingway on the movie “Papa”

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

[On Tuesday my brother Paul and I went to Richmond to visit the Virginia Museum of
Fine Arts and to see the movie “Papa: Hemingway in Cuba,” which was playing there although not here in Charlottesville.]

F: 8:30 a.m. So, Papa, we saw “Papa.” Not a first-run movie for you, I imagine.

EH: No, but a first-run movie for us, as for everyone who sees it with me.

F: I hadn’t factored that in. Pray proceed.

EH: No need for me to do it. You were told long ago, and can get Rita or someone else to discuss the concept with. That kind of thing still isn’t my preferred mode of interaction.

F: Theory, you mean.

EH: Generalization about abstractions, let’s say. I generalized all the time, and not always about things I knew well enough to generalize about. I dealt with abstractions too, although I was wary of them. But the two together were a little far from the heart of where I lived.

F: You preferred a mixture of concrete and distinct, or intuitive and sensory.

EH: Even that is more abstraction and generalization than I prefer to entertain.

F: So let’s talk about the movie itself. I was fully prepared to be seething but fortunately that isn’t how I reacted. I liked it. I thought it was done with good heart and good intent and sure knowledge. I imagine your friend Denne [Peticlerc] is pleased?

[pause]

So what is the pause about? Is it that I am hesitating, wondering if I am about to lead myself astray making something up?

EH: Maybe it’s just the situation. You have other things to do, and it keeps you from having your mind totally on this form of communication. There will be other times.

F: Okay. Anything you would like to say?

EH: Just note the various manifestations of psychometry you are hearing about or practicing, and think about the subject in writing.

F: The actor and the typewriter.

EH: It isn’t something you made up, clearly.

F: True enough. I’ll find the paragraph in the news story and add it to this entry when I type it in.

EH: A movie can be a very powerful if diffuse means of something very like psychometry.

F: I remember the thing I was told about everyone who reads a book is directly connected to the author and to everyone else who reads it.

EH: That’s right, only don’t think of any them – least of all the author – as statues, unchanging and fixed in a moment of time. They are not being photographed by you, they are interrelating with you. Now go have breakfast and start your day.

F: Later, then. Thanks, Papa.

[from http://www.biography.com/news/papa-hemingway-in-cuba-movie-review]

Filming on-location had a profound effect on Sparks’s performance. “I remember Adrian standing in exactly the spot in the bedroom that Hemingway used to stand while he was writing,” the director says, adding that the museum let Sparks use Hemingway’s typewriter. “He came to me later and said: ‘That is when I stopped acting and starting channeling Hemingway.’”

John Wolf on the ego as scapegoat

[I am very glad to see this course-correction. Too many people — especially New Age-influenced people — tend to blame the ego and deify the self, which I think is a serious misreading of the situtation.]

A Short Lesson About Attitude
by John Dorsey Wolf

We might call this “R&R”, not the military term meaning “Rest and Relaxation” from being on the front lines in battle; instead, “Ramifications of Rita” as I digest and ingest her material via Frank.

A couple of thoughts came to me the other day while I was on the freeway.

A driver in front of me was well into an exit lane, and at the last second veered suddenly without signaling across two lanes to return to the freeway. I grumbled to myself, “That idiot!”. (Actually, it was a few non-PG words to that effect.) Along with that statement I instantly felt threatened, generated some anger, and sent that energy out into the Universe.

In the past, searching for what part of me might be responsible for this behavior on my part, I would say it’s my ego at work. I have no formal psychology education, and I won’t pretend to fully understand what ego is. I simply view my ego as the externally oriented aspect of me.

Continue reading John Wolf on the ego as scapegoat

Rita and TMI’s Professional Division meetings

Thursday, March 17, 2016
F: 2:50 a.m. Greetings, Miss Rita. Not only from me but from your many friends at the PD [TMI’s Professional Division]. You are well loved, and your messages are read with interest. I’m not sure we can continue just as if we’d never paused, but I’m willing to try. I’ve missed this. Do I need to re-read the later entries before we begin, to get back on track? I know you put us on pause, but what I don’t know is whether that means my own “having been elsewhere” will interfere.
R: What is more likely to interfere is your lack of sleep. Are you sure you are ready?
F: No, actually. I was having trouble breathing, so I took it as a sign. But I seem to be all right at the moment. Maybe I’ll try for another sleep cycle or two. I guess you can hit the remote.
4:20 a.m. Okay, let’s go. I brewed the coffee this time, so now we have to go. 
R: Well, it is good you come to it with enthusiasm, anyway. Scan our last couple of entries; it will make it easier to resume.
F: All right. Don’t go away.
Continue reading Rita and TMI’s Professional Division meetings

Krishnamurti on reforming systems

Our Norwegian friend Inger Lise Karlsen adds this comment to another post, which I think deserves a place of its own, this election year. From J. Krishnamurti, Total Freedom — The Essential Krishnamurti:

“What is the good of learning if in the process of living we are destroying ourselves?

“As we are having series of devastating wars, one right after another, there is obviously something radically wrong with the way we bring up our children. I think most of us are aware of this, but we do not know how to deal with it.

“Systems, whether educational or political, are not changed mysteriously; they are transformed when there is a fundamental change in ourselves. The individual is of first importance, not the system; and as long as the individual does not understand the total process of himself, no system, whether of the left or of the right, can bring order and peace to the world.

“Without understanding the whole complex being of man, mere reformation will bring about only the confusing demand for further reforms. There is no end to reform; and there is no fundamental solution along these lines.

“Authority, as “the one who knows,” has no place in learning. The educator and the student are both learning through their special relationship with each other, but this does not mean that the educator disregards the orderliness of thought. Instead the educator and the student sharing the freedom of thoughts between them, following the same line. And both learning from each others.

“The fullest development of every individual creates a society of equals.”

John Wolf — A greater being-centric perspective on Transition

John Wolf 1-17-2016
A greater being-centric perspective on Transition.
In addition to a different perspective on transition, there is also material here I found interesting on how our beliefs affect our “vibratory signature” and how that signature determines our next residence during transition.
What is written below is a result of me asking myself the question, “What do I now think I understand about transition?”, incorporating the latest teachings and my own “knowings”. To begin with, I don’t consider any of it is uniquely “mine”; although, if someone asked me what is my current thinking on transition, this is what I would say.
My interest is incorporating what can be understood from the latest teachings of Seth, TGU, Rita through Frank, and others, as well as our own personal resources into a greater being-centric perspective on the subject of transition, potentially bringing new and useful insight.
Continue reading John Wolf — A greater being-centric perspective on Transition