[Saturday, January 21, 2006]
So perhaps I should work. Disappointing yesterday that I couldn’t really get my head right to start – and I think I knew it ahead of time….
All right. We have spoken of time and space and separation and delayed consequences. All this was to lay the groundwork so that you may see more clearly that there are other ways of seeing yourselves than as individuals. Continue reading A New Model of Consciousness in Space and Time – 6
Not least of the resources The Monroe Institute has offered me are sessions in its isolation chamber, which I call the black box. After December, 1992, when I did the Institute’s Gateway Voyage, many things opened up, as I described in some detail in my book Muddy Tracks. In 2000, after I had moved to the New Land (where the Institute is located), I did a session of 10 PREP sessions in the box with lab director Skip Atwater as monitor. Week by week, I transcribed the audio record of the sessions and posted the transcriptions on the institute’s Voyager’s Mailing List. The postings met response, and it does seem to me that these transcripts provide a taste of what it is like when you begin to learn how to communicate with the other side.
So I intend to post those transcripts here. But first (stealing from and silently editing the Muddy Tracks description), this account of the session that took place in 1993, also with Skip, three months after my Gateway, at another Monroe program called Guidelines.
[Thursday, January 19, 2006]
(8:30) Not a very long break – just time enough for a toad in the hole – but hopefully enough refueling that I can continue. I don’t particularly want to wait.
No, go look out the window and quietly have some coffee for a few minutes. Come back at 9, say. These things have their own rhythm and you need to learn to discern and respect it or you will do your body damage as Cayce did.
All right. Continue reading A New Model of Consciousness in Space and Time – 5
[Thursday, January 19, 2006]
7:95 a.m. Starting again, not without apprehension. Can today’s transmission possibly measure up to yesterday’s? Can it continue and flow into a seamless and meaningful whole? Stay tuned.
You are doing fine. Faithfulness is all. It isn’t up to you to provide the content. If it falls down, it falls down – but yesterday didn’t turn out so bad, did it?
Yesterday was wonderful. I’m ready if you are. Continue reading A New Model of Consciousness in Space and Time – 4
This third post continues the information received in three sessions on the same remarkable day.
[Wednesday, January 18, 2006, continuing]
(9 a.m.) Beautiful day, and not only because of this splendid contact. All right, friends, so what is your proposed model.
The elements of this model have been given to you in bits and pieces over the past five years and more. Now we propose to put them together in a way much of which will be familiar to you (now) and some not. Continue reading A New Model of Consciousness in Space and Time – 3
You never know when a good idea is going to occur to you….
[Friday, January 13, 2006]
Would be nice to receive some clarity on the subject of Joseph Smallwood. With my receptivity to past life contact set now to 50% instead of 20%, that is a jump to two and a half times as open. Surely that should make a difference.
Rita suggested that I am not open to receiving information about female incarnations. Is this true? If true is it necessary? Another way of asking, what purpose does that serve? “How are you serving me?” If not true, why so many men and no information on the women?
Hard to answer when you are afraid of what you might hear. This is a defect of a commitment to openness (and why so few people proceed in this way!) You make your mistakes in public, and you can’t cover over what you’d prefer not to have known. But after all there is no reason why you have to make public anything you choose to withhold; it is a matter merely of squaring it with your ideals.
Well, I don’t know how well connected we are at the moment: I feel pretty drowsy, distracted. But I think it is a way of putting off the question.
Then, if you wish, ask something easier.
That’s interesting. I do see, it is a matter of “ask something easier” for me to allow, not, for you to say. Continue reading Changing the Settings
[Wednesday, January 18, 2006, continuing the transcript of the same session]
Those who perceive spirit as one of the elements of a human being see it as an immaterial “something” that is necessary to life. No spirit, no life. Extinguish life, destroy the bond between body and spirit.
We have no quarrel with that view. In practical terms, “it works.” Continue reading A New Model of Consciousness in Space and Time – 2