Blog

 

Time	Perceptions	Inferences
	Dedicate session to Higher Self and appropriate Lower Selves of  DW, to MS,  and any others who may appear, for use at appropriate time(s) – or for non-use if that is in the best interests of all concerned. Confident of, and grateful for, all needed help to identify, clarify, understand, and if appropriate heal issues presented, recognizing that it is an unusual session.	DW begins to enter extra-ordinary states of consciousness
	January 6, 2022 3:10 pm EST DW:  “Is the soul now embodied in MS available for conversation at this time?” MS:  “Yes.  I am relieved and gratified that you have finally called on me.” DW:  “Thank you.  I could not call until I had received a kind of permission to do so.  I  hope you understand that I needed your Free Will authorization to call.” MS:  “Of course.  What else might I have expected of you, DW?” DW:  “MS, would you be interested in joining JG and approaching the tunnel to heaven – at this time?” MS:  “As a matter of information, of curiosity, yes.  Would it be safe for me?” DW:  “In all my experience, yes.  It is and would be safe for you – whenever you are ready.” MS:  “JG, are you ready to take a little trip now?” JG:  “Yes, my dear one.  Let us go look, together, And they do, in the company of a WOWG and a WOMG, stopping at the entrance to the tunnel as depicted by Bosch. MS:  “It is beautiful, isn’t it.  So peaceful, inviting, with such a strong feeling of love inside.” JG:  “Just as I left it last time.” Entrance to Bosch’s Tunnel to Heaven, PG, JG with MS, WOWG, WOMG, DW observing   MS:  “I had no idea it would be like this.” JG:  “It’s always like this, always inviting, always loving, like coming home.” PG:  “Welcome, friends.  I/we have been hoping to see you here soon.” “How pleasurable it has been to see your caring for each other.” MS:  “PG, You left a wonderful man when you came here for yourself, years ago.” PG:  “He has been in your good hands since.  Thank you, dear friend.” MS:  “Dear JG.  Is it time for you to stay here now?” JG:  “Will you be safe, healthy, young again if I stay now?” MS:  “Sad/sorry to miss you, but happy to know that I have a life to re-new here now.”  “Yes, Please feel free to stay here now.  I feel and will be refreshed by this awareness of your love for me, and of PG’s comradeship.” MS:  “PG, he is still the man you remember, and, maybe a little riper in some ways.” PG:  “Bless you, MS, for all your care, comforting, reassuring, loving that I have eavesdropped on for so long.” JG:  “MS, no adequate words to share with you at this time.”  “I’m home again.  I wish you a long happy healthy life beginning now.  ‘Live Long, and Prosper!”   MS:  “DW, is it okay to return home, to go back down now?” DW:  “When you are ready, we can go.  There is a nice soothing little park partway down where we can rest and review.” MS:  “PG and JG, we go with love now.  Thanks for everything.” 3:46 pm EST start down and End Segment. [36 minutes at Focus 27]	MS is the partner of JG, who is nearly ready to transition.   ‘DW’ is acting as Guide for this act.                             JG has been here before, both in NDEs and as he came with his ex-wife PG, when she transitioned                                           PG, JG’s ex-wife has been waiting for them   PG and MS have both loved JG                       JG is  staying in Soul form saying farewell to MS
	January 24, 2022   [18 days later] 6:15 pm EST DW:  “Is the soul that was embodied in JG during the 2010s available for a quick conversation?” JG:  “Yes, still here, DW.  Feeling poorly and napping a lot, but still here.  Did you call last week?”  I think I remember a party we were both at about a week ago.” DW:  “Yes, I did.  I believe that PG dropped by to say hello and welcome.  Do you remember anything like that?” JG:  “Vaguely, foggily.” DW:  “Okay, I was just checking to make sure you are still available and still here. Thanks.” PG:  You are most welcome.  C U soon.” 6:23 pm EST End segment [8 minutes at Focus 27]           March 23, 2022    [Two months later] 10:49 EDT DW:  “Hi, JG.  Back again.  It’s good to see you here in this form, young strong, vibrant,  enriched and enlivened by all those experiences in this embodiment.” JG:  “Always optiimistic!  Always sunny.  Thanks, good friend.” DW:  “It has been a great, constant, pleasure to know you for these last few years. DW:  “How’s it going now, this very moment?” JG:  “Glad you’re here.  Can we have another party now? DW:  “Wonderful invitation.  Let’s go!” And they do…. Entrance to Bosch’s Tunnel to Heaven, PG, JG with MS, WOWG, WOMG, DW PG:  “Welcome back, dear friends.  We have been hoping to resume our visit. JG:  “Thanks, I didn’t really want to do this so soon.  So good to feel young again, free again, healthy again, in the company of such wondrous souls.” MS:  “Wonderful souls, indeed!”  “So are we all.” JG:  “MS, it is not easy to leave you at this time.  We need a special word, perhaps ‘Aloha’, to say thanks, until we meet again.” MS:  “I understand, dear Jack.”  “My life has been so much richer with your love, closeness, energy, vitality.”  “Of course I will always treasure these past few years – you made me feel bigger, more loving, more loved, and part of a wonderful unit.” DW:  “Friends, let me leave you to your celebrations.  I know there are many other souls waiting to join you now.”  “MS, do you want to go back down now?” MS:  “Not really.  But it’s Jack’s welcoming celebration now.” MS:  “I will treasure this moment, and these past few years, until we meet again.” JG and PG:  “DW and MS, as we Vulcans say, ‘Live Long and Prosper!” DW and MS begin a slow gradual return to ‘normal waking consciousness’, carrying warm memories of other-worlds love and visions of what is termed ‘Heaven’. Maybe stopping for a while in a Park-like green rest area. 11:18 End segment. [29 minutes at Focus 27]   March 24, 2022   5:28 pm EDT DW:  “Is the soul embodied in JG available for conversation at this time?” JG:  “Just barely, old friend.  They’ve got me wired up, with oxygen.  Still here but raring to go.” JG:  “This is not a way to live.”  “Can you do anyting to get me out of here?” DW:  “Is the soul of Maury Hanson available for conversation at this time?” MH:  “Hi, guys.  JG, you’re in a fix, aren’t you?” JG:  “Yes, Maury.  Can you help?  As an old medical man, probably not.  I understand.  As a loving soul?”  “I would appreciate whatever you or another Guide might do to help.” Guide6:  “DW, this is not my line at this time.  But, perhaps the Project can use some of that wonderful experience that JG earned during this more recent embodiment.”  “Okay, JG.  Come with me.” Guide6:  “JG, I will recommend you to join the project team as soon as you are comfortable here.” JG:  “Bless you all.” JG:  “And may God bless all those who loved me and whom I loved during this embodiment that we re ending now.” 5:41 pm End Segment. [13 minutes at Focus 27] 5:18 pm EDT:  ‘Rita’, the soul that was embodied as Rita Warren until 2008:   “JG, you needed, asked for, and were granted your request.  Welcome here.  May I join you in the celebration welcoming you back?” JG:  “Have we loved before?” ‘Rita’:  “Of course. We’ve been in soul form for a long time.”     5:55 pm EDT End Segment [Total of 37 minutes at Focus 27, in two segments]   April 27, 2022    A month later 11:48 pm EDT DW:  Guide6 “  perhaps the Project can use some of that wonderful experience that JG earned during this more recent embodiment.”  “Okay, JG.  Come with me.” Guide6:  “JG, I will recommend you to join the project team as soon as you are comfortable here.” JG:  “Bless you all.”         Guide6 and JG gently leave the boundary of DW’s physical body. JG soul leaving DW physical boundary 220427 11:57 pm EDT End Segment [9 minutes at Focus 27]	May refer to events on pages 1 and 2.            DW is very confused that JG is still here in body.

 

 

Saturday, September 23, 2017

All right, I think I know where you are going next. Passions. Emotions, at least. I have been hearing that we live in a sea of emotions.

Do you not think it is interesting that philosophers and scientists attempt to explain the human life without beginning from the self-evident fact that human life is dominated by emotion? You are not creatures of thought, or logic, or yearnings for knowledge, or any of the things you may consider yourselves to be when you sit down to define your lives. You are living an endless procession of emotions, even the calmest of you, even the iciest and most self-centered and autistic of you, even the most sociopathic self-centered of you.

Your lives are not about thought or about rational development. They are the living of forces from well beyond consciousness or thought.

Pretty broad brush we’re painting with, this morning.

It did get your attention, perhaps, and in this case, that is not so easy. You have such a firm opinion of something so obviously incorrect, it is necessary to shout, you might say.

You had a friend who was convinced that he felt no emotions. He thought of himself as a hard-headed scientist, seeing himself and his life rationally, surrounded by people whose lives were driven by emotion. The fact that he was wrong but certain could sum up the human situation in this regard. You are the conduits of vast impersonal forces, and you rarely suspect the fact, because when you are aware of the forces flowing through you, they seem to be your forces, mobilized for some personal reason, or provoked by some personal encounter. And when you are not aware of them, you forget the awareness, and you go back to thinking yourselves rational self-directed beings.

The sense of what you meant just penetrated, and I guess I’ll be better able to say this than you will. I can at least use a one-inch brush instead of a paint-roller.

I tend to define us as rational beings with problems: emotional biases dating back to childhood, sometimes; the effects of past traumas; what analysts call complexes; persistent failings we are unable to root out. But I realize, we could at least equally well be defined as creatures living lives shaped by forces either beyond our control or needing to be controlled.

That is an advance in understanding, is it not? You are not rational beings interrupted by emotional forces. You are compound beings living your entire life as conduits for forces that flow through you, you doing what you can to channel and direct them.

That is not the picture John Locke would paint of humans. Nor B.F. Skinner. But equally it is not the point of view of Freud and Jung and those who accompanied and followed them. They recognized the role of passion in the human, but they assumed that the human occupied a detached place that was affected by the emotions and what they knew as the problems of the person. They did not necessarily see that in any person’s life the central fact is that the 3D individual is a conduit of forces from beyond. They tended to see the 3D individual as a separate unit affected by these forces.

We have repeated this now, several times. We wonder: Have any of you actually heard it? We repeat it from time to time, because you may find the concept elusive. Your physically separate and seemingly independent life accustoms you to thinking your mental life equally separate, and your civilization accustoms you to seeing your emotional life as an offshoot of your mental life, which is ridiculous but persuasive because habitual.

I think that for the first time I understand why metaphysical types and religious types can not take each other seriously!

Not to mention the scientific types, the “hard-headed realist” types and especially the worshipper of an idea of the mind as an ideal. Go ahead.

It is not just a temperamental difference, nor a matter of prejudice, nor of strongly held opinion, though that is how I have usually seen it (on either side). They aren’t using the same definitions!

They do not consider the same forces, no. They define the world differently.

And that isn’t a matter of opinions, but of orientation. Religious thought begins by seeing humans as living in a torrent of forces that often manifest as emotion or even as persistent non-rational motivators. Religious thought proceeds from a recognition that we as individuals are not the basic unit we think ourselves to be, but are conduits of vast inhuman forces that they perhaps personify as God or Devil, or perhaps see merely as illusion. [I was thinking of Buddhism, here.] For those who do not see life in this way, religious thought seems nonsensical, superstitious. And psychotherapy is halfway toward religious thought, only it persists in thinking the individual the unit it seems to be, rather than the construct and community it also is.

All right, now you, and at least some of your readers, will have made the adjustment. You will find life looks differently, only, look close to hand, don’t succumb to the temptation to look only (or primarily) at others, or at society at large. Look to your own lives: What else do you know so well? What else can you know “essence to essence?”

This is very interesting. With that one fundamental insight, we can proceed beyond futile arguments about the track record of organized religions, and about points of dogma, and about most of the things that prevent discussion on sympathetic grounds. Once realize that the great divide is between those who think us independent units mostly motivated by reason and those who see us as conduits of vast impersonal forces, and lots of things clear up, including where (relative to that divide) we ourselves belong.

Bearing in mind, of course, that this is one way to divide the world. It is useful at any given moment, but remember that the cake may be sliced in many different directions, to yield different, equally valid, divisions. But this particular division should prove particularly useful just at the moment. This is a logical place to pause, and an opportunity for people to examine the nature of their lives to see if they agree with what has been said.

 

Friday, September 22, 2017

Our present theme is that your 3D life is partly real and partly misperception. We want to convey that your 3D consciousness, considered by itself, has room to grow. What you are aware of can expand, depending upon willingness and circumstance.

Doesn’t it amount to saying, we can become aware of more of the content of our entire mind, rather than only the 3D-specific parts of it that we always have?

In a sense, yes. But there is more to it than that:

• Willingness means you have to be able to deal with it, and you have to be able to do the dealing.
• Circumstance means, not all times are equally propitious. Carpe diem. Those who are willing to expand their everyday-life consciousness will of course find the propitious circumstances.

Of course?

It isn’t as if you were stumbling around in the dark. It is not up to your 3D-delimited mind to find new opportunities. Your greater mind, your All-D mind, will always bring you what you need when you are able to make use of it. You can lead a 3D mind to water, but you can’t make it drink, so not every opportunity is taken. Nothing tragic about that, it’s just the way things are in 3D.

However, the counterbalancing factor is propitious times. Sometimes you have to wait. That’s a reason to use your opportunities when they become obvious, lest you miss the opportune moment and are forced by circumstance to wait. Again, it isn’t a tragedy, but it can be inconvenient. It is true that the world will bring you what you want, and that you can choose the reality you want to experience, but your own lives ought to tell you – the 3D reality of the lives you are all living at the moment ought to tell you – that of course it isn’t that simple.

You can’t get anything from the material if you accept it but don’t relate it to what you know by living it. So don’t just say, “Oh, yeah, create your own reality, I don’t have any problem with this” – apply it! Ask yourselves, “Why, if it is true, does my life contain what I don’t want as well as what I do?” And don’t settle for an easy answer that explains things away. Wrestle with it.

If you find it easy, you aren’t wrestling with it.

You have to really look, to really see what it is you believe, and if you find that you believe two things that seem to contradict each other, you need to work out a sense in which they do not. The more sincere effort you expend, naturally, the better the chance you will get something meaningful out of this.

Here is something substantive to chew on: All human activity expresses.

Expresses.

We said it that way purposely. It matters less (for the moment) what it expresses. Our point is that human life is expression; it is not an end in itself.

In the sense of an actor’s role being an expression of his craft?

Yes, not a bad analogy. Your 3D life is being acted, and you as actors are expressing as best you can within the limits of the role and within your own ability to play that role. So, the play is real in its own terms but is only a play in a larger context, as we have said.

Our role may include transcending the limits, but we can’t transcend the role.

That’s well put. Anything you do is possible, or you couldn’t do it. But nothing you do is out of character, because the character is what you make it.

Now, we have just said, in 3D you express. Express what? Clearly, the forces flowing though you. At least, we hope that is a “clearly.”

I think it should be. How could we express something that we didn’t have within us?

Having it does not mean being aware of having it, of course. But yes, that’s the sense of it.

Well, if you express what is flowing through you, can you safely disregard or define out of existence things like hatred, contempt, malice, oppression? Can you decide that the evil impulses you feel and that you see expressed around you do not exist? That they are “merely” something or other, something innocuous and unthreatening? It can be done, of course, and is done. But is that an honest assessment of the situation?

The same may be said of good, but to say it might lead misleadingly to self-congratulation and rose-colored glasses, so we begin with the consideration of what so many would wish to define out of existence, even while they continue to lock their cars, protect their person, and deplore the news.

 

Friday, September 22, 2017

So let’s start with these forces that express through us. Where do they come from?

They exist. In a way, what does it matter where they come from? Anything you are told may or may not be true, but what you know is that you experience them. Start with what you know.

But – not even a general statement?

If you wish. Good and evil, and everything that is meant by the words is part of the fabric of existence. But does that really tell you anything?

It seems to tell me that they are not incidental, and not peculiar to the 3D world, as we might be tempted to assume.

If you will associate ideas, you will see that that could not be so. The 3D world is part of the larger world, so how could the forces of good and evil be particular only to the 3D and not be part of the same All-D that includes 3D? It’s impossible. It is a confusion of ideas. And as to “incidental” – what does that mean? Are they accidents? Unwanted side-effects? Illusions produced by inability to see clearly? Are they not pretty important, to be incidental?

This is an absolutely major point. Your lives are not, and are not for the purposes, that you think them. That is one reason why life may appear to be pointless. You may seek for meaning in achievement, and find it hollow and unsatisfactory, even illusory, like Churchill in his old age. Neither is meaning found in the satisfaction of appetites or the recording of sensations. What is satisfying?

In my experience?

That is all you have to go on. Anything else is hearsay.

In my experience, the only things satisfying are the exercise of a skill and the assistance of someone.

And perhaps all the better if the one accompanies the other. So what does this tell you?

I suppose if we are made a certain way, whatever skills we develop are expressions of our selves. Maybe that satisfaction is the opposite of the sense of wasting time. And helping people fills some inner need; I don’t know to what extent it is universal.

Do the exercise of skill and the helping of people provide meaning to your life, as well as satisfaction?

They are more meaningful than other things, but no, they aren’t enough. Is that what you mean?

What does provide meaning? Dig.

The same thing that indicates that you have found your bliss: the things where you lose all sense of time while you are doing them. And that’s about the same two things, exercising skill and helping people.

Only, those are doings. What about beings? What about how to be? What about an attitude toward life? How can you look at life so as to really feel its meaning? Not in theory, but in practice?

I guess I’d have to say, when I feel like I’m being employed for some purpose beyond me. This.

And what does that tell you?

I suppose it is the opposite of feeling useless, or isolated, or without purpose.

Feeling connected, perhaps.

Meaning that the sense of connection is the reward? Is an indicator that we’re on the beam? Or what?

Draw your own implications, remembering that one size does not fit all. What makes you feel most alive, most fulfilled, most – well, most real? The answer you get will tell you more about your role and how to stretch or transcend your role than anything else could.

 

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

The initial insight was that our lives are only “somewhat” real because this level of reality we experience is not in any way an ultimate level. Since it isn’t, we aren’t. We are, in a way, characters in an on-running drama, created for the purpose of being conduits of forces greater than us, realer than us somehow, preceding us and, I gather, destined to outlive us. They may be eternal, whatever eternal means.

Compound beings. Humans. Constructs that live in an abbreviated version of reality, knowing only what can be known while constricted to a present moment that is a moving pinpoint. Yet, eternal beings no less. We are made of eternal stuff, but our particular guise is more transient than that. No, that isn’t wrong, but it doesn’t get it, either. Let’s try again.

Our part-of-Sam nature is as eternal as Sam, and relative to any one earth life, certainly a Sam is eternal, immortal. We, sharing that essence, are equally so. Not much different from religion saying we share the essence of God (whatever God may be). But if we are made of the undying essence of a Sam, the combinations we form are not unchanging or necessarily eternal. Joseph, Bertram, Frank, etc., all have a limited existence in 3D. Do they necessarily have an unlimited existence beyond 3D?

Essence and personality

Our essence is Sam’s essence. Our personality is the 3D expression of certain combinations of traits, etc. Essence is real and unchangeable. Personality is more like a mask or a costume or a role in a drama, and is real only in its own terms, as Han Solo is real only in the Star Wars movie context, while Harrison Ford is real beyond the movie, in 3D life. But Harrison Ford is real only in the 3D context. The actor who is playing Harrison Ford himself is real beyond the 3D context, in real (realer?) life.

That’s the difference between spirit and soul, come to think of it.

• Spirit is unchanging, unchangeable, unconstrained: the actor playing Harrison Ford.
• The soul is born into 3D, experiencing all the emotions of life, affected by what happens to it: Harrison Ford as played in 3D Theater.

We are both actor and character, and that combination is source both of great confusion and of great opportunity for growth. Religions see us as both divine and human, do they not? And Jesus is reported to have said that anything he had done, his followers would do and would do more, or greater. (I often wondered if his calling himself “son of man” meant that he was what we could become.)

In any case, if we are both actor and character, it is as if Han Solo became aware of being the creature of Harrison Ford, and began speaking and reacting as Harrison Ford rather than as himself, not knowing the link between them, and perhaps not sensing the confusion as actually a breakthrough.

It might play hell with the movie being shot, unless the movie was about Han Solo discovering he was a creation of (part of) Harrison Ford. But we aren’t in a movie, but are doing improv.

And it comes to me, maybe one reason for the improv is for the actors to see through the drama (knowing there is no plot) to see:

• that they are actors (i.e. only relatively real in that their roles are added on to their essence, not intrinsic to it) and
• that the purpose of their acting is to give expression to the forces that flow through them. The cardinal virtues, the deadly sins: real forces, expressing in 3D.

Why? As a sort of safety valve? A puppet show? Why?

The cardinal virtues: prudence, justice, temperance and fortitude. (And some add faith, hope, and charity.) The seven deadly sins, whose initials I years ago made into an acronym so I could remember them: LEG CAPS. Lust, envy, gluttony, covetousness, anger, pride, and sloth (or ennui).

[Returning to the usual format in which my entries are in itals.]

[TGU] All human life may be considered as a playing-out of those forces among varied circumstances.

But the forces pre-exist human life.

They are realer than human life, as you are realer than your human roles.

Hard to see how they could manifest outside of 3D conditions. Gluttony? Lust?

That is how they manifest in 3D conditions. But the underlying forces exist or they could not manifest.

I suppose not. All right, so where do we go from here?

Think of these forces as your 3D environment, and resume here.

 

Thursday, September 21, 2017

The question is, how does 3D life express forces that are realer than 3D life itself. This collaboration may be a little bit complicated. It is as if there is systematic interference between what we want to express and what you understand us to say, or mean, or intend.

Yes, I think it comes from the differences between your experiences and our assumptions. Why not continue to use Rita as intermediary, or anybody whose human experience will enable them to make allowances and understand how to compensate for differences in assumptions?

That has been done, for millennia. The advantages of the proceeding are obvious. But there are disadvantages: the unwanted associations of ideas, of the sounds of the words, of logically unrelated but emotionally connected incidents or thoughts, mostly unnoticed, almost always incompletely traced.

This is even on the non-3D end?

What else are we talking about? The obstacles on your end are constant, it is the obstacles on the other end that are variable.

Oh, I get it, I think – the vagaries of the temporary joint mind.

We cannot add unwanted assumptions if they are not there to be added.

That’s an interesting complication that had not occurred to me.

Keep firmly in mind the larger theme: Why is 3D life only “somewhat” real? But bear in mind that this is going to bring you a long way seemingly afield, and will involve what seem to be extraneous matters, and contradictions, before we can bring in enough context to allow you to see things sufficiently differently. We need to associate many things in your mind that have never been consciously or coherently associated by you. Much of what you need to know you do know, only you don’t know you know it, or you know it only in a seemingly unrelated context, or you know it distorted by other people’s reports.

While writing that, I had the thought, “You’re finding it easier to speak,” and then I had a flash of “You’ve connected to Rita somehow and learned how to do it,” though I don’t think that’s quite right. But, something has changed.

There are others in the mental world, call it, besides Rita, you know. But your intuition was mostly correct.

You are somehow communicating through Joseph, or someone!

That’s right. This still involves distortions, but using personalities even closer to you provides the link with language and assumptions, but with fewer confusions. In dealing with you through Joseph Smallwood, we are dealing essence to essence on your end.

All right. This kind of communication is always essence to essence in that it bypasses the personas that are our pre-established interfaces with “the other.” So it is mind to mind, not mind to verbiage to reception to mind. But mind-to-mind between X and Joseph, say, is different from mind-to-mind between X and me, or X and Bertram. It is as if each of us is a different mood of our over-arching being.

Yes, and that is enough for the moment. The point is that whoever we contact, bias will have been thereby introduced. The process cannot be helped, it must be allowed for.

I get the feeling that if I pursued this correctly we’d learn something about why spiritualists used to think they needed a conductor to bring them to the one they wanted to speak to.

Don’t forget, those were early days. Their ground rules never applied as universals, however helpful they were to their times.

So, are we good?

Yes, we have a way to proceed. It will have its disadvantages, but we will work around them.

I take it that who you connect with may differ depending on where we go.

Depending on many things, many of them unsuspected on your end.

had been thinking the guys had said that they took turns speaking to us – that sometimes even in the middle of a sentence, one phased out and another phased in, usually unnoticed by us. It strikes me now, they may have been saying that the intent remained constant, but that the minds that they were silently connected with as intermediaries might fluctuate. Small difference, but significant. Did I get that right?

Remember always, in this work: Many, even most, of your misunderstandings and misstatements will go unchallenged. In the course of time, contradictions and errors will emerge to be corrected, but if we were to be correcting every misstatement, it would involve so much tedious restatement and spelling-out of context as to make any coherence impossible. When you get something wrong and it is going to make a big difference, we have to correct the statement, and the correction itself is part of the learning. But if it is minor and has no great consequences, we let it go, in the way that you, say, might not correct every slip of someone’s grammar for fear of inhibiting them from saying anything at all.

 

Further examples of exploration, continuing over many years.

“Trip Report”

November 10, 2020

 

Time	Perceptions	Inferences
	Dedicate session to Higher Self and appropriate Lower Selves of  DW  and any others who may appear, for use at appropriate time(s) – or for non-use if that is in the best interests of all concerned. Request help to identify, clarify, understand recent increases in abilities for Intuitive Communication Links and explore limits of such explorations. Confident of, and grateful for all such help and support to begin this task, recognizing that it is an unusual session.	DW is starting this trip without his customary Hemi-Sync cassette tape;   DW begins to enter extra-ordinary states of consciousness
	2:15 pm EST DW: “Is the eternal soul that was embodied in C. G. Jung in the 1980s available for a short conversation at this time? CGJ:  “Hello.  Who is this and why do you call at this time?” DW: “Dr. Jung, I am a researcher embodied and living in Virginia, U.S.A.  For several years I have used a new experimental technique to communicate with souls such as yourself.  I have had several very pleasant and informative conversations with composers of whom you have known:  Beethoven, Richard Strauss, Sibelius, and Tchaikovsky.  My conversations are beginning to involve souls such as yourself who have explored and worked with Soul energies in their lives.”  “Is that adequate for your purposes?” CGJ: “Welcome.  I have heard of your conversations recently.  Jan Sibelius and Piotr Tchaikovsky have mentioned your work with and for them.” CGJ: “What may I help you with at this time?” DW:  “Dr. Jung, earlier this year I conducted a series of conversations with my first wife, LJ, beginning before her death of lung cancer and continuing until she chose to begin another embodiment in a Great grandson.”   “She unveiled many facets of those experiences and completely recast my understandings of Soul embodiments and compositions.”   “My curiosity leads me to learn more, and recent conversations with medical men have begun to involve healing of physical bodies using spiritual or Soul energies.”  “Can you add anything that I, (as an engineer, not a physician,  might understand) to those conversations?” CGJ: “Yes, indeed.  Thank you for calling.  Several of us have been watching and eavesdropping on those conversations with great interest.” CGJ:  “You probably suspect that you have gone further than any of us, from the Western tradition at least, have ever gone.” CGJ:  “Several years ago you received messages from ‘TGU’s sending from far-off locations, perhaps outside this galaxy.”  “They mentioned their soul form and described how they chose to experience life inside some physical creatures then living on your planet, Terra.”  “They seem to have intended to make a sharp change in evolution of what became our species, Homo Sapiens.”  “It appeared to you that they described making changes in your species for more than 500 thousand earth years, and that they planned another ‘mid-course’ change in the Homo Sapiens Soul to increase the upper limit of our species’ evolution and Growth.” CGJ:  “The increases in ILC abilities you have been experiencing may well be small parts of that major change now under way.”  “Do you follow so far?”     DW:  “Jawohl, CGJ.”  “Your description matches the understandings  I have been given.” CGJ:  “It appears that they intend to increase the healthy physical lifespan of our species and to make Soul changes to reduce our propensity to destroy each other.” DW:  “Thank you for that addition to my understanding.”  “It helps me understand my recent conversations with medical people.”   “Not accidental.” CGJ:  “Now, the souls you know as ‘Wise Old Men’ and ‘Wise Old Women’ Guides [WOMG and WOWG] have been evolving for many centuries now].  From our side here, we are pleased to see that you have begun to work with a few Highly Experienced Wise Old Guides as well.  The ones you term ‘WOWG3’,  WOWG4, WOWG5, etc.” DW:  “CGJ, I may be nearing the edge of my ability to work in one session.  It is wise for me to end this segment at this time.” 3:01 pm EST DW:  “With your permission, I will call to continue this conversations within the next few days.” CGJ:  “Understood.  We await your return with anticipation.” End Segment [46 minutes at Focus 27] November 11, 2020  2:32 pm EST DW:  “Good afternoon, Dr. Jung.  I return, refreshed, and eager to continue the conversation.  When we talked last you mentioned your pleasure in seeing that I have begun to work with a few Wise Old Guides.  Would you care to continue with that train of thought?” CGJ:  “Yes, indeed.  Welcome back to you.  We don’t know exactly how to proceed with this topic.  It is quite new in our experience.  But let us, as you say, ‘fumble our way along’.  Let us quote from a recent conversation you shared with ‘LJ’, as she changed her status.  This may be a good starting place to ‘fumble’ onward.” CGJ:  “On November 5, 2020 you two shared: 9:00 pm EST DW:  “Baby Cal Shepherd Smith arrived on November 4, 2020.  He looks and acts healthy and strong.” DW:  “Now, is any part of the soul that was LJ still able to communicate at this time?” LJ:  “Of course.  What did you expect?  Only a part of this soul, a ‘thread’ is now in baby Cal.  Over the years many ‘threads’ of this soul have been parts of embodied souls.”  Now you are communicating with that eternal soul which is timeless, that is ‘Outside of Earth Time’.  In that same way the ‘thread’ that was in Louise Jones Werling is now lost in Earth Time.  This eternal soul remains available when the time and conditions are appropriate.” “Live Long and Prosper, DW.  We may meet again.” CGJ:  “Let us ‘unpack her statement.  She told you that only a part, a ‘thread’ of her soul is now in the new baby (we notice with pleasure that the baby is the Great Grandson of an earlier thread, whom you knew as Louise Jones).  Is this not a surprise to you?  In your time you have been celebrating your understanding of the ‘DNA’ that transfers instructions for a physical body.  Would you continue to be surprised that she has hinted at the equivalent mechanism for transferring the ‘Soul Equivalent’ into a new absolutely, incredibly, unique complex personality?” DW:  “It would be a brand new thought for me.  Yes, I would be, I am, surprised to be shown that possibility.  And as I consider it I wonder at the ingenuity of that.”   DW continuing:  “May I infer that I began conversations with “LJ”, the eternal soul, back in December 2019, while she was still in part embodied?” CGJ:  “You would be entitled to jump to that conclusion.”  “Then, as the conversations continued, you would be enabled to see the gradual separation of soul and body that took place over the following months.”  “We agree.  It is remarkable, and we on this side are still just beginning to understand part of that process, of that remarkable system.” CGJ:  “Now, you are wondering about what you have been calling ‘Soul Fragments’ and how they are useful in repairing and healing wounds that may occur during human lives as Complex Soul/Physical Body personalities.”  “Consider that the ‘soul fragments’ – as integral parts of complex personalities – have access to both physical body sensations and memories and Soul memories.”  “Take some time to mull over that string of associations.” DW:  “Yes, I need time!  Thank you for all those fumbled insights.  I’ll be back for more.” 3:10 End Segment [38 minutes at Focus 27] November 12, 2020   9:56 am EST DW:  “Is the soul that was embodied in Esther Althea Butler Werling in 1940 available for conversations at this time? EAW:  “Yes, my son, Dickie Boy.  My, how you have grown!” DW:  “Thanks, Mom.  Good to get in touch with you in this form.”  “You may know that I have been very concerned about your life, as I may have affected you, during the difficult years 1931-1937 and 1938-1949.  In retrospect, it seems to me that your embodied life was very lonely, overworked, worrisome, and boring.  Looking back, with knowledge I have gained since, I see how difficult it was for you during those years. At this point, I can do no more than appreciate what you accomplished despite  the depressing conditions.  I can only say ‘THANK YOU’ for that lifetime.  And, I hope that your soul has had happier embodiments since then.” DW: “Can you tell me a bit about your recent embodiments?” EAW: “Calling me at this time brings exquisite pleasure to me.  In many ways your life since 1950 has made my sacrifices not only bearable but worthwhile.”  “I had no idea who or what you were during those years.  As I see you and your soul today, I realize that I had an important part in the development and nurturing you needed to reach your present level.”  “And don’t underestimate that level.”  “Today I am honored here for having made those sacrifices; they were what you needed to leap several steps in your Soul Growth.”  “That has also brought my soul to a higher level than it had been before.” EAW:  “You don’t need to know anything more from me at this time.”  “Go on with your life and discoveries.  As you are so fond of saying, ‘Live Long and Prosper’!” DW:  “Many many thanks, mom, for your support across many generations and embodiments.”  “Perhaps some day I will be able to repay the debts I owe you.” EAW:  “’Pay it forward’, not to the EAW that was, but to those growing as she has done.”  “Fare Well, Dickie Boy.” 10:18 end segment. [24 minutes at Focus 27]   December 25, 2020   11:14 pm EST DW:  “Is the soul that was embodied as Esther Althea Butler Werling in 1980 available for a short conversation at this time?” EAW:  “Did I make a mistake?  Do you need a little bit more from my memories at this time?” DW:  “Yes, I’m afraid so.  It seems that I am in a rapid growth spurt at the moment,  and need a few facts about our lives, my life, while I lived with you.” EAW:  “Perhaps I could rummage around and find something to help you.  What do you have in mind?” DW:  “I have quite recently become aware that most women and girls have a good time in their lives, put lots of energy into creating things (like creating three attractive nourishing meals a day).  This has surprised me and I wondered if you could fill me in a bit.  Perhaps related to that, I recall at about the age of 20 thinking that the purpose of [my] life at the time was to work, not goof off, not play, not waste money or time.”  “It seems to have had its rewards in my later life, but I wonder what I have been missing along the way.” EAW:  “Oh, what a can of worms you’re opening!”  “That was MY life at that time, not self-fulfilling, not very satisfying, without many close women friends and no close men – except those I met in church.”  “It seemed the best I could do for you was leave you alone to do your things.”  Your brother Bob went into the Air Force and lessened my concerns for him.  Your brother Bill was busy and fulfilled working for the cleaner, Jack, who was a good Father figure for him.”  “And I was starved for affection, fulfillment, joy.”  “Perhaps it was catching.” My empathy probably picked it up and absorbed it, thinking that was the way life is.” EAW:  “I hope that helps in some ways.” DW:  “It’s all I could have asked for, or suspected in trying to make sense of where I have been and what I have become.  The other day I conversed with an older Soul who lived in the 1879-1930 time period, and he asked me ‘WHAT are you?’ You say you are living in a body but you have more abilities than many of us Souls here.”  “Mom, you can imagine what a surprise that was to me.” EAW:  “No, I wondered that all your life!”  “You and Grandpa Butler were cut from the same cloth, but you weren’t like anyone else in the family.” DW:  “Many thanks, Mom.  I don’t think I will need to bother you again.”  “Thanks for all you have done for me – perhaps in more than this life I have asked about.” EAW:  “You are most welcome.  Again, I say ‘Go with God’ and “Live Long and Prosper!’” 11: 39 pm EST End segment. [25 minutes at Focus 27]	Notice how easy this is, at this level   Seems to be a ‘normal’ conversation; he’s right there.       Guess they gossip up there     Jane; this is an important summary of what LJ showed me           Eavesdropping!   Oh…   C.G.Jung helps me understand how our Eternal Souls got here.                             Jung continues         Seem to be related to Frank’s ‘TGU’s      Too long out of physical body..                               Seems to be a lot of continuing research at the TGU levels….     ‘LJ’s newest embodiment, as her physical Great Grand-Son!             Note his word, Unpack                         Snark?                   Mull over that string of associations!               Jane; NEW Subject, my mom this embodiment.                   No, she didn’t             Tear-stained cheeks on DW here.

 

 

Translating (from September, 2017)

Saturday, September 16, 2017

You have been told that your life as experienced is only somewhat real. This is because your life as you are experiencing it is deeper, with stronger cross-currents, than a mere conflict of compound-beings. You got the idea: Try to express it.

We see history as it affects us, so it becomes a matter of MacArthur and Wilson and Roosevelt and Hemingway and John F. Kennedy and Churchill and Robert Henri, and W.B. Yeats and so on. In other words, it becomes seen as a matter of individuals. And to us, this is reality. It combines the external world we experience (even at second-hand), and the inner world we construct or experience as we cooperate in shaping our ideas of what is going on.

But a deeper level of reality involves the same events, the same individuals, but experiences them as forces, as – I don’t know how to put it. As manifestations, I suppose.

Try not to stop there, but continue, for when you return you will not be in the same place.

In a real sense, our 3D lives may be seen at different levels of reality, and our accustomed way of seeing them is relatively superficial. Hatred and fear, in various combinations – all the deadly forces that run through us, as well as the living forces too – they could be said to live their own lives through us. If you were a playwright, you might try to express certain ideas. You would have to clothe the ideas in characters, and express them in conflict and interaction of the characters. It would be the interplay of forces that concerned you, and the interplay of the characters you had invented would be secondary.

Well, not exactly. You acquire a stake in the characters as you animate them. You should know that as you think of the Chiari brothers and others you have brought to life and then seen having that life, with its own bounds and possibilities.

 

Tuesday, September 19, 2017

[The following entry reverses my custom of putting “my” words into italics and “their” words in Roman, for ease of reading.]

All my reading of novels, history, biography, and my frequent viewings and re-viewings of films may be seen in a different way. Behind those stories of individuals are stories of conflicts of forces, of ebbs and flows of the power that flows through people for its own purposes.

Your practice has been to bend your habits in certain directions in order to compensate for tendencies that would interfere.

Okay, we’re going to have to work differently, aren’t we? Let me try to say what I just got.

The whole sequence, extending from about 1989, moved from my initial attempts at automatic writing, through communicating with The Boss[i], then a personified Evangeline, then the guys upstairs, then individuals such as David Poynter and Joseph Smallwood, then historically recognized figures like Carl Jung and others, then (more as exceptions than as part of a progression) people I had known. It was a long sequence aimed in part at changing how I went about things, correcting not only mistaken ideas but habitual traits that tended to interfere. This latest course-correction was to get me to slow down, to settle in, more than I have ever done or been able to do. There are forces that can only be heard when we are still enough.

With time and confidence and changes in interlocutors came changes in my role. Dictation became conversation. Conversation clarified into part instruction, part how-to. From the beginning, the process was never what I expected, but was peculiar to me. It was quite disconcerting to Rita in 2001, I remember. But she and I worked with the situation, and I don’t see how we could have done our work, then or subsequently, if we had tried to make what came to us fit into some preconceived box in format or content. And now, I think we’re changing gears once again. It’s like we’re edging toward Bob Monroe’s “rotes,” where non-verbal transmission of information has to be unpacked into words, which can only be done by someone familiar with 3D restrictions of thought and experience.

Those of us who are able to move among levels we are here as translators, stitching together different levels of understanding. The point I’m getting to is that what is obvious reality to one level is fantasy to another. We see it in our 3D lives and it is also “as above, so below.” It just depends upon how far you care to extend it.

So, if I say that our 3D lives are only somewhat real because we are the embodiment of forces beyond the 3D level, some people intuitively get it. Others have to wrestle with it, at first having to take on faith that I am not speaking nonsense. Others not only can’t make anything out of it, but you might say won’t. It is self-evidently nonsense, and they aren’t going to waste their time. The different levels don’t translate.

And this brings us back to this thought: Dramas are stories, and stories are doorways into other levels of meaning. But doorways are only doorways if you walk through them, and those who are not ready to go through them never even see them as such.

Sunday, May 7, 2023

6 a.m. Perhaps you have other fish to fry, but I’d be interested in more about how you and we and the times interact to choose which threads among all possible threads to follow, in the course of discussion.

It won’t come as some blinding revelation. Like most of what we have to say, it is your everyday life seen from a different angle. Why should anybody expect that what we have to describe will be something never before seen or talked about? Context is all.

I do understand that. Just as yesterday, you remind us of the overarching situation and then look at something well familiar but not well understood.

Or, let’s say, not well understood in a certain context. Often it is one detail now to be seen in its surrounding form, purpose, function, and effect. A shoulder joint won’t make much sense to someone with no experience of shoulders, and how are shoulders to be understood except in the context of the body as a unit. And so on and so forth. Close examination shows everything in new light. At the same time, the thing being examined remains the thing it is. Therefore, a certain kind of mentality cannot listen to people like us. For one thing, it cannot sit still long enough to look into nuances and contexts. For another, anything it encounters reminds it of something else, and rather than following the exposition, it follows associations of kindled ideas. And of course some merely snort and say, “That’s nothing but….”

However, there are the rest of us –

So you think, but in fact it is not a difference among individuals (or even among communities), but among moods.

I get that. We may be one or another kind of mind, depending upon the subject matter.

Ys, very good. You may have infinite patience with the complications and associations and nuances in history or psychology or even metaphysics, and be totally unable to sit still before similar explorations in chemistry or politics or celestial mechanics. If we were to sketch one rule of thumb here, it would be, You aren’t as invariant as you sometimes think yourselves.

Hmm, another variable? As, you, the times, and now the subject matter?

Let’s go a little deeper. Slow down, go into the crystal.

Okay.

“The subject matter” is less invariant, too, than you might think. The same subject isn’t the same subject from one time to the next, and you know why, if you think about it.

Rather than thinking of it as a unit, thinking of it as a galaxy of connected points leads one to see that who and what we are, at any given moment, affects how we and any subject matter interact.

Or, may interact. There isn’t anything determined about it, but the opportunities differ, yes.

I remember beginning to learn of the fascinating details of structure because Nancy Dorman showed me her coloring book on the human musculature, and talked about various things, from her knowledge as massage therapist, I’d never paid attention to. I realized for the first time that the body was an interesting thing in itself, not merely an often inconvenient conveyance.

It may not have occurred to you how many avenues that exposure opened up. Your healing work had been as abstract as your care of your body, if somewhat less careless and taken for granted. After you began to pay attention, gradually you developed the habit of associating body and mind functionally, as well as conceptually.

You’re right, I hadn’t made that association. I can somewhat remember stages of my progressive realizations, and if I were to concentrate on it, probably I could reconstruct a line of pebbles: this, then this, then this.

And construct is exactly what you would be doing; choosing among potential memoires which ones you would associate, and in which order.

So, you see, just this few minutes’ work illustrates how you and we and the times and the context develop a theme in one direction that could as easily have gone in a different direction.

Let’s send it in a different direction, if only for the sake of illustrating the process.

Well, let’s go back to “So you think, but in fact it is not a difference among individuals (or even among communities), but among moods.” We could as easily say, moods are a function of the interface between conscious and unconscious mind, between yourselves as you understand yourself and yourselves as you interact with the world in ways beyond your awareness, or yourselves and what you think of as the externals of the world.

Yes, we have been there.

You see? Your initial response represents your mind in another mood.

Got me. Did you plan that?

We allowed for it. You might have responded in a different way, and might yet. So – respond again.

I suppose I might ask, what determines moods?

No, rather than approaching it abstractly (another potential reaction, you see), another personal response.

I can see at least one potential take-away: We oughtn’t to judge others, unless we are willing to include ourselves in the indictment. What we judge in others is behavior or reaction we ourselves engage in, in another mood.

Yes. And you might look at moods as delineations of difference, or let’s say as treaty provisions.

Well now, that’s interesting.

Certainly. Again, you were thinking of yourself as an individual, but if you remember that you are also a community, you see that any mental state amounts to an accommodation among peers.

An accommodation that varies with circumstance, time, and God knows what-all else.

As we’re always reminding you, every subject provides links to deeper connection, depending mostly upon your willingness or otherwise to pursue it. Or, not so much pursue as allow.

Sure, I see that. “Pursue” implies we are hunting, tracking something down. “Allow” implies we are sitting quietly, waiting to see what timid or stealthy animals emerge from the underbrush. Or, to change analogies, “allow” implies that we at most steer our canoe in its downriver course, moving toward whatever draws our attention.

So you see,  thinking that your mental flow is under your control, or is not under your control, or is partly and intermittently under your control, are three very different ideas, leading to perception of different kinds of possibilities. As usual, any simple answer would be simple at the expense of accuracy.

Always an education, and frequently an entertainment, talking to you guys. Our thanks as always.