Tuesday, April 15, 2025
12:40 a.m. Should we begin? We were going to discuss illness as facilitator.
Which is the same as discussing wellness as facilitator, or geography or heredity or proclivity as facilitator.
Just one more factor in bounding our possibilities, you mean?
Certainly. Not all factors are of equal strength within any given life – certainly not between or among other lives either – but they are factors. In discussing illness, it is important that we not accidentally give the impression that it is particularly determinative. It can be; it isn’t usually. But everyone will have a weak link in their armor of health. It may not be particularly weak, but in the nature of things, not every link will be the same strength. Under stress, one will be more likely than others to fail.
And in the absence of stress?
Many people live their entire lives without a physical or mental or emotional link snapping or even bending. Such cases are not particularly fortunate; this situation merely means that their challenges come in other forms: poverty, perhaps, or isolation, or being square pegs in round holes. Inability to conform to what is expected, lack of brain power; it could be anything. But for the moment we will confine ourselves to the question of health. How does health or a specific lack of health provide opportunity by its very restriction?
I can imagine it steering us away from things the illness renders impossible.
Or it may lead a person into those things for the sake of confronting and perhaps overcoming impossible adversity.
Living on the edge, for the sake of it.
Some people thrive on danger, some on adversity, some on security. It takes all kinds of people to make a world.
So let’s take Helen Keller as one example. Blind and deaf. How could she ever be expected to interact successfully with the world? Impossible, surely – only, she not only succeeded with the help of the remarkable woman [Anne Sullivan] who guided and nourished her; she attained a remarkable level of wisdom and benevolence.
Mark Twain was deeply impressed by her.
So, was her hardship a disadvantage or a spur?
Both, surely.
Of course. Every gift has two sides, and may be turned to account or may become a curse (in effect) by how the person uses it or refuses to use it, accepts and transforms it, or refuses to do so.
Christopher Reeve set up a foundation to promote research into spinal cord injury, and probably never would have done so if he hadn’t been injured.
Yes, but it is important here not to make the mistake of thinking that the effects you can see in 3D are the only effects, or even the most important effects, in terms of a person’s life. Most people in any situation are unknown or relatively unknown to a public. But who could be unaffected by living with such a condition? One more instance of, You never have the data to judge other people’s lives.
Have we wandered from the theme of illness as facilitator? Have we even begun on it?
Just as with illness as indicator, there is no need to spell it out by means of examples. A long table of relationships wouldn’t really add anything, and might deter thought about the relationships. Suffice it to say, health and illness, like every other part of life, ought to be kept in mind and ought not to be made an excuse or a scapegoat.
If we’re through with the subject, how about if we return to the four categories medieval man used? [That is, choleric, melancholic, sanguine or phlegmatic natures.]
I didn’t use them, and anyone wishing to learn about them will find plenty on the internet. What would be the practical application of such a discussion?
None, maybe. Very well, so what next?
Next get some more sleep, and when we resume, we’ll see.
Okay. Thanks for this much.
4:05 a.m. I was saying yesterday, you must feel much lighter without the drag of the body.
Lighter, yes, but of course it isn’t all profit. When you lose the 3D anchor, you lose a certain amount of concentration. You won’t find great writers composing outside the 3D crucible, at least not in the same way. Conditions matter.
Still, would you trade?
You wouldn’t think so – but as usual the question is more complicated than it seems. For one thing, 3D comes mixed with non-3D. It has more possibilities than I realized at the time. More than most people realize. And non-3D has, as you know, certain compensating disadvantages to go with its added freedom. On the other hand, if I had never been in 3D – if I wasn’t an ex-human compound being – maybe I wouldn’t know what I was missing.
Like AA and BB in Bob’s tale? [In Far Journeys]
That’s what I had in mind. AA was seduced by the sheer energy and wild potential of life in the physical, remember. Games within games, he said, feeding the score. It is intense, you have to give it that.
And we, caught inside it, can’t wait, sometimes, to achieve liberation.
Typical perversity of life, always wanting what we don’t have, rarely valuing what we do have.
My favorite analogy for that is – like breathing. If you’ve always been able to breathe freely, you don’t know how to value the fact, not really. Abstractly, maybe.
Or any other physical or mental or emotional condition people live within. They know what it would be worth not to have to deal with it, but they can’t really convey it to others, and they themselves are just as blind to the reality of the prices other people pay.
It occurs to me, possibly we haven’t sufficiently stressed the element of clarity in all this. You have heard that your task is to create enough internal space, by reclaiming the initiative from various robots, to achieve life more abundantly. But maybe another way to say that is, Achieve greater clarity.
Know thyself? Not exactly a new formula.
“New” doesn’t matter, any more than if something is easy or hard for someone to say. What matters is, is it true? Know thyself – which means know what you’re in 3D to do and what you ought to leave alone. And how do you know yourself? You have to be willing to look, and you have to be able to see, and you have to be able to understand, and make decisions and carry them out.
That sounds like bullets.
Yes it does.
- Willing to look. That takes courage sometimes, because everything about yourself that you disapprove of is probably shoved down into the unconscious. You don’t want to know, and you work pretty hard sometimes not to know. But if you aren’t willing to look, how can you get beyond superficial understanding? This is one reason why life often puts people in a bind, to force them to do what they need to do but are reluctant to do.
- Able to see. The light that puts out our eyes is darkness to us, Thoreau said. Being able to see involves more than willingness; It also involves capacity. That is why many people never do this work. they know at some deep level that it would destroy them. Ask any psychiatrist. It can be dangerous to the patient to learn too much too soon, or in the wrong way.
- Able to understand. People may be willing and able to see, yet still be incapable of understanding what they perceive. You should know by now, context is – well, it isn’t everything, but it is an awful lot. If you perceive but do not have the ability or the background or the inclination to put two and two together to make four rather than 44, you aren’t going to gain much clarity.
- Make decisions. Logic and reasoning are enhanced by the 3D experience, believe it or not. Having to deal with things partially and sequentially imparts a certain skill in analysis and prediction. But such a skill isn’t useful unless put into play. If you don’t choose, you drift. (It isn’t quite that simple, but more or less so.) Only decisions allow movement in a given direction. Often enough, decisions are made by default, but that is a poor procedure, pretty much guaranteed to be unsatisfactory.
- Carry them out. What good is it to decide what to do, if you can’t bring yourself to do it?
Call this split session “Facilitation and choice,” perhaps.
Or “Facilitation and discernment”?
Either, or something similar.
This split session worked well. Having a couple of sleep cycles between the two reduced the fatigue quite a bit. Thanks again; I know we’re all enjoying this.