[Excerpts from conversations between Rita Warren and “the guys upstairs,” in the years 2001 and 2002, edited from The Sphere and the Hologram.]
The Record and the Needle
R: We’ve heard the term Akashic records. Does that term mean to you the total knowledge that’s available to you to tap into?
TGU: Well, it’s not a library building, the way some people like to think of it, and, you know, it’s not a computer terminal, but it is there, objectively written (so to speak) in the fabric of time-space, and you probably will stump us if you ask how we read it, we just – read it. But if we were to ask you, How do you remember last Thursday, could you answer? You don’t know, you just do. It’s such an automatic mechanism, it would be very difficult to trace out. The Akashic record is not separate from time-space, it is time-space. It’s the same thing. So if you’re looking at it, there it is. But how we get to looking at it – we do it by intent, same as when you talk, and as when we talk. Just as it is your intent that points this conversation. [pause] Have we confused you?
R: I am following that, and I’m thinking about it and making sure that I understand what you were saying. You were saying that you from your perspective have the advantage in that you’re seeing it all at once, and the totality of it –
TGU: Well we didn’t quite phrase it as an advantage; it’s just a circumstance. There are advantages to being quite pointed in time-space, and disadvantages, and obviously, the other way around. Our disadvantage is a somewhat diffused consciousness. It’s an advantage, it’s a disadvantage. It depends on how you look at it. We would not at all say it’s an absolute advantage over you; it’s an advantage in certain ways. We have an advantage not so much in perspective as in totality of access. You can provide the needle to play the record, we can provide the record to be played by the needle.
R: I like that. When I interpreted you to have said that you understood more, you asked us to get back to you on that. That didn’t seem to be quite the way to put it. You were using an analogy of a child and an adult.
TGU: Our meaning would be that a child sees probably more clearly because it’s more clearly focused: It’s absolutely right at the moment. But what it sees it may interpret badly for lack of context. This is the only way in which we would make the analogy between us on this side and us on – you on your side. It is like a parent-child relationship, in that respect strictly, not in any other way.
But our perspective is tempered by our experience, and the experience is relatively vast because we have vastly expanded access. Your awareness is perhaps more acute than ours, because where we see somewhat fuzzily because our consciousness is less intense, you see sharply as anything, and your struggle is to be able to provide a proper interpretation to what you see so clearly.
[pause] We do want to stress, that’s the only aspect of the parent-child analogy that applies. We’re not saying that you were created from us or anything on that order. [pause] Although, that would be another metaphor, actually, [chuckles] but we don’t want to muddy those waters.
—
The Sphere and the Hologram, 15th anniversary edition, published by SNN / TGU Books, is available as print or eBook from Amazon and other booksellers.