Monday, October 2, 2017
Physical train wrecks and psychological debris and vast impersonal forces flowing through us.
You all know how these forces sweep through your lives; you see it first hand, you see it in dramas and histories and twice-told talks. Passion and conflict is at the heart of story, after all. No conflict, no story. But is conflict as simple a thing as self-interest colliding with self-interest? You could make a reasonable argument that that is all it is, but we would say that argument would amount to “nothing buttery,” and would clarify nothing.
Lust manifests!
Anger, envy, swollen pride manifest!
You see them on all sides. Conversely, anybody could tell first- or second-hand stories of noble actions, of self-sacrifice, of quiet unnoticed heroism. Scratch any story and you will find people acting out of motivations. Scratch the motivations and you will find desirable or undesirable passions, maybe quiet, even placid, but passions. An old woman may be invisibly passionate over her flower garden, or her pets, or – anything, really. The key here is “invisibly.” Although passion is at the heart of all drama, not all passion expresses itself in a dramatic fashion.
These forces make up your life. The man who sacrifices his life day by day at a meaningless job, that his children may live and hopefully may live better than he, is acting from conviction, and what is conviction rooted in, if not some passion?
We will not continue to pile up examples. Look at other aspects of your life, the events around you and those you only hear of. Wars, cooperation, disasters and disaster relief, millions of private enterprises commercial and otherwise, and millions of pointlessly destructive activities like vandalism. Music, art, poetry, technology, finance, scholarship – all the forms of human activity you can think of. At some place they connect to passion.
So where does it come from? In trying to answer that, realize that plugging in a word like “instinct” is not an answer, because not a process, not a linking-together of things, but a word implying “nothing but”; it is a decision not to inquire. So – inquire. Where does this force come into your life from?
You may think, “I was born with it,” and that is certainly true, but it doesn’t answer anything. It says that you have never lived without it. (Nor could you.) But we knew this: Soul without Spirit is not living in the 3D world; it is closer to being a ghost of itself.
All right, but that sort of answers the question, doesn’t it? These forces are the forces of Spirit.
Fine. And what are the forces of Spirit?
I take it the answer is not as simple as “The electricity that runs through the wires,” or “The light that shines through the fiber optics.”
That would be merely to restate in other words what was said. Resist the temptation to consider the Soul as in 3D and the Spirit as coming from the non-3D somehow. Try to see both inhabiting the All-D, so that, although they coexist in the same space, Spirit is mostly not comprehended by Soul. You could say, pretty accurately, that
- Soul is bound to its 3D limitations in which it was founded
- Spirit inhabits all of reality, not only the 3D portion of it.
Hence Spirit is invisible to greater or lesser extent depending upon how conscious the Soul is. Spirit is always here, always functioning, but is it not always perceived, and rarely is perceived in the same way at different times by different Souls.
The next step is to realize that since Spirit interpenetrates your being, its vagaries are going to affect you, often directly.
I didn’t realize that Spirit has vagaries. I think of Spirit as – well, as a vast impersonal force, the way you have been describing it.
You are thinking of Soul and Spirit as two different kinds of things that happen to intersect in human enterprises. But Spirit created Soul. It animates Soul. It shares its essence with Soul.
I thought we were saying that a Sam creates a soul of its own essence.
Do you think a Sam’s essence (in so far as it is personal) is somehow different from Spirit? That we have Spirit on the one hand and Sam on the other?
I guess I don’t know what I thought. I never thought about that as a problem at all.
Well, let us give the kaleidoscope a shake and see if anything emerges more clearly. Look at it this way. Sam = Spirit creating and incorporating and developing and fostering Souls. In being so engaged, it loses some of its freedom of action, somewhat as a parent does to a dependent child, and becomes part of a compound being. So the difference between what we call Sam for convenience and what we continue to call Spirit is whether one is or is not part of a compound being.
So I take it that Spirit too can be subdivided into more or less individuals, some of whom make one choice, others other choices?
“As above, so below.” What is individual seen one way is community seen another way.
Huh! Well this is a startling development.
Think about it and we’ll come back to it.