Monday, June 13, 2022
6:10 a.m. I see I have several related questions from Bob Paddock. I edited it down a little; let’s look at the questions posed, which I number (at your suggestion, probably).
- [Bob Paddock:
[One Saturday in 2004 Karen and I were going to cook something on the grill. She was already in the kitchen. I was about to walk into the kitchen from the dining room. My precognition told me that a plate was going to fall out of the cupboard and break. Just as I was about to warn Karen, behind my right shoulder was a disembodied voice that said, very sternly: “No! She needs the lesson!” I said nothing. The plate broke and that event led to her needing the Fluoroquinolone antibiotics Levaquin that caused systemic tendonitis. This event was a significant contributor to her suicide in 2013.
[So the perplexing and troubling questions:
- ‘Someone’ knew what I was about to verbalize, and more importantly they knew the future consequences of me doing it. What is this about???
- In 2014 Karen said via Winter, with you present, “I played my part well”. I’m so glad. :-/ Now what part am I to play?
- Who is writing these scripts of this ‘play’??
- a) Why did I not find it odd and troubling that there was a disembodied voice telling me what to do, and b) why don’t I hear from it more often?
[Frank/TGU said on April 17th” “Psychological, physical, whatever, life’s pain can reach overwhelming levels while other people’s lives appear charmed. Does this show that the world is unfair in reality rather than merely in appearance? Or does it suggest that – as we keep saying – you never have the data to judge?”]
We’ll begin not with one of the questions, but with the final implied question embedded in our prior, rhetorical, question.
Perhaps the best way to respond is to say that both halves of the rhetorical question are true, each in its own sphere. The world is unfair, if seen as if it were absolute and isolated. The world is not unfair – can’t be unfair – when seen as part of an unbroken whole. How one perceives its fairness or unfairness is a sure indicator of the standpoint of the person judging. Once you realize truly the way things are, you cease thinking that you are more moral than God (so to speak), more intelligent than the universe. We would add that if people whose life experience is as painful as Bob’s can accept the wider viewpoint, there is little use for others in easier circumstances to paint themselves or others as victims.
Now, question 4, which is actually 4 (a) and 4 (b). We will speak as if to Bob directly, others overhearing.
- You didn’t find it odd or troubling because a part o you knew what you were there to do, and knew why something inexplicable to your conscious mind would help you as well as Karen to move to what you would become. After so dramatic an incident, you would hardly be able to ignore your other precognitive experiences. That is, here was something you couldn’t put in a box and tuck away.
- But would you really want to have disembodied voices telling you what to do? As an emergency alarm, fine. As a daily or even yearly occurrence? Not so fine.
This answers (1), in part. The larger part of you that we often call the non-3D component knows your life and its various choice-points. (It doesn’t have to view your life past to present to future, as is the sensory default.) Knowing it “in advance” (from a 3D point of view) is not the same as creating it, or forcing it. If you set down a ball and it rolls downhill, you may know it will roll downhill, but it isn’t as if it would roll uphill except for your intervention. This is not a difficult distinction, but it is easily overlooked or misunderstood.
In this one event, unusually, your higher knowing intervened; said “no,” and you trusted, even if later you doubted or regretted or bitterly accused.
You know the answer to your second question, because you are living it. You wrote about the experience, in an attempt to awaken the medical community and the public to the dangers. Well done. You continue to live out your commitment. Only, remember, it is your choice. You can rachet your involvement upward or downward, and either way, there is no blame.
As to (3). We have explained the situation any times. Instead of seeing it as scripted, it is more productive, freer, and more accurate, to see it as improv arising from the situation and the characters in the situation, and how they proceed. It is your life, to make of as you please. Bear in mind as a rule of thumb (or as an act of faith) that nobody gets away with anything, and nobody gets short-changed, all in all, despite appearances.
Our thanks. Short session, but I have other things to do, as you know. What would you call today’s?
“Precognition and fate,” perhaps.
Yes, not bad.