[Rita:] I’m hesitating at the brink, to find the pathway via your mind, to get where I want us to go. Anything coming in by non-sensory means is still subject to interpretation by the mind of the person in 3D, no less than if the person were interpreting (making sense of) sensory data. So the same information given to more than one person will take on not only a different “flavor” for each, but will be allowed in, or excluded in part, or will be combined with other data, in a preferential manner that amounts to individual “uniqueness,” or even “bias.” The very transmission of data through a given person flavors the information inevitably. It cannot come through in a theoretically pure fashion. I structure it on my end, you structure it on your end, the readers in turn structure it on their end, and, if they set out to convey to another their understanding of it, those they convey it to structure it in their turn.
So that transmission is a process of inadvertent modification.
It is, and that may be looked at as beneficial or harmful, and is of course both, as usual. If you are looking here for scripture, you are going to be disappointed, yet if you are looking for Divine Inspiration you cannot fail to find it.
I hear you saying, “the word kills, but the spirit gives life.” I don’t know that I’ve ever thought to apply the scripture in that sense.
What other sense is there? Didn’t the guys tell us that they didn’t want us treating their words as scripture? They meant, use the words to come to an understanding as best we could, but don’t petrify them, thinking they could have any particular meaning or any given number of meanings. Transmission always involves interpretation at the unconscious level, because the nature of those involved cannot be excluded from the process, but is the process.
So in seeking a strategy of explanation, I must consider my own bias (to the extent that I am aware of it) and yours, and that of the probable readers to follow. As you can see, it cannot be an exact science! I sit here, so to speak, in my newfound freedom from physical limitation, and I am only all the more aware of the limitations of individuality. So – I in turn hand over to the middle term of my Rita / TGU / All-That-Is equation, to try to get a yet broader perspective and have it to hand on to you. Thus – hesitation.
A lot there to think about. Presumably whatever your TGU level is, it has its own TGU level, and so on and so forth.
Precisely. And perhaps all we are doing, really, is seeing the expression of All-That-Is as it is filtered through various levels of interpretation.
— From Awakening From the 3D World, available from publisher Rainbow Ridge Books (https://www.rainbowridgebooks.com) or from ot
“And perhaps all we are doing, really, is seeing the expression of All-That-Is as it is filtered through various levels of interpretation.”
ALL indeed! 😎😊🥴🥳 Seems like a very interesting, useful way of looking at life …