Tuesday, November 7, 2017
“It’s always something”
All right, since I have to be up anyway, I suppose we should begin. That doesn’t sound particularly gracious; you know I love doing this, but I’d be just as happy to do it under fewer physical constraints.
It does not occur to you perhaps that this maximizes the use of those constraints. That otherwise you would have the constraints but nothing productive to do within them.
You think I don’t know that, after a lifetime of sitting up reading, rocking forward and back, painful breath by painful breath? I’m not going to go into it, but I’m damn well aware of the advantages of being able to use physical problems as a sort of platform to kick away from. And if uncomfortable nights were the price I had to pay to be able to do this, I’d be perfectly happy to make the bargain. Only, it’s the same unexplainable contradiction I’ve always lived: I know that I should be able to just – turn something, adjust something – and be well, only I can’t find it. And this isn’t just about me, obviously. Everybody wrestles with something; why can’t awareness overcome it?
If you had Aladdin’s lamp to grant you even one wish, let alone three, what good would it do you? In fact, look how much harder it would make your lives. You were told once that if you had an infallible source of knowledge of what was going to happen, you would then be prone to Psychic’s Disease. In 3D, you function under limitations, and if it isn’t one thing, it will be something else.
Well, my father always used to say, in exasperation, “It’s always something.”
Yes, we smile too, but of course it is always something. That’s life. And by that we mean, that is the essence and fabric and value of life: not just limitation, but conflict, problems, difficulty. The very things you may think of as drawbacks are, in fact, demonstrations that all is well, all is always well.
So much easier to see that in other people’s situation, but I do see it. If we are here to choose and to create ourselves (if only by choosing among versions, which one we prefer to live, moment by moment), then obviously there must be things to choose between, and for the choices to matter to us, one must be more attractive, one less attractive. Which implies problems.
That is taking things a little too much at a gallop. Let’s look at it slowly.
I know, I know. Concentrate: con-center-ate.
And you see the first thing that happens?
It seems my breathing improved, only it isn’t quite that, is it?
The overall feeling improved because although the wheezing continued, the circumambient tightening of the muscles relaxed, reducing the discomfort.
I had a definite sense that you wanted me to use “circumambient,” which ordinarily I wouldn’t. Why?
It is more precise, more descriptive, than merely saying “surrounding.”
And that is important, why?
Perhaps your habits of thought and expression are not so uniquely and entirely yours as you may think.
Okay. And I get that that is a real point, not just a comment. In other words, we’re all in this together; 3D and non-3D, individual and what we might call our mental (or at least non-3D) community.
You see, anything widens out, at least potentially, if you concentrate. Slower isn’t necessarily deeper, but it may be. It’s up to what you do with it. Faster may get you safely over thin ice; not necessarily, but maybe. It is, as we say, all a matter of how you live it.
So, to return to my statement that was made too much at a gallop?
No need for us to spell it out for you. Sink into it. That is the advantage of writing, after all; the words don’t move.
It isn’t quite a matter of setting up problems so we will have things to choose among.
No, not Shaw’s “moral gymnasium.” So then, what?
I am forgetting the universal in thinking of the individual.
That’s the right idea, but – slower.
Well, in thinking of the problems we face, it is habitual for us to think of our situation in isolation, because that is of course how it will present itself. And I see the relevance of the allusion to speed. In our day-to-day situations, we are usually skating, having enough to deal with, moment by moment, and perhaps little enough time – even if we have the inclination – to examine it more closely, slower. Maybe any situation, any set of choices, offers insight into larger things, if we have the time and inclination to feel our way into it.
Your lives are never accidentally dropped into circumstances. Inner and outer are the same thing seen differently, remember, one through direct feed via intuition (or, non-3D link), the other through sensory apparatus and extensions. So where is the possibility for meaningless occurrence? Not every choice is momentous; that doesn’t mean that it and its context are meaningless.
So, our lives are bound into the times we live; we know that about our outer circumstances. That means we are equally bound into the times we live internally. Have to be, since it is the same thing. Which means our thoughts and feelings and all are caught in a tide. Have to be. We are not independent, though we think we are; we are independent to a degree, and social to a degree.
This should be obvious to someone who has studied astrology and seen the tides running through the lives of everyone on Earth, not just any one given person. What the tides react on, or let’s say individually affect
The cosmic tides are a sort of background for us all. But we don’t experience it as a common background. We experience the interaction between the tide and the individual we are, shaped at birth at a particular time and place. So, we all live in the same – circumambient, since you like that word – cosmic tide, but the individual is affected by that tide differently depending upon what that tide finds pre-formed [by previous decisions] at any given moment.
Didn’t we posit vast impersonal forces on the one hand, and individual complicated pipes for those winds to play through?
Yes, clear enough now, in this context.
So was it worth while to be rousted out of bed?
I may cease to answer rhetorical questions.
Yes, good. We smile too. But you see.
Well, I see further implications, too, accurate or not. It seems to imply that certain problems can only be worked with at certain times.
Again, just a little slower.
It’s just what astrology would tell us: At any given moment, certain things are easier for the given individual (depending upon his or her composition) and other things harder. Does this quite imply that whatever problem or opportunity surfaces at any given moment is the best thing to concentrate on?
Easiest, anyway. “Best” is a matter of value and judgment.
And there’s our hour. Well, it turned out to be pretty productive, I think. Not what I would have expected.
There is something to be said for taking what comes.
I do know that. At least, for my kind of person. Other types tend to shape things more, it seems to me.
Hammers make poor screwdrivers. Wrenches make poor drill-bits. Every implement to its own uses.
Thanks as always.
[And as a sort of PS, I had already closed the book when it occurred to me – with help? – that this entry is an example of taking what comes. They began where I was and continued as they were able to. Maybe from their point of view they’re always doing that.]