All is one, but –

Thursday, April 14, 2022

3:15 a.m. It may be too early for this, can’t tell, but I seem to have had my fill of sleep. Do we move to “Continuity (3)”? Do you have something other in mind?

A few words may be appropriate on something we said in passing. It is easily misunderstood, but will bear fruit if considered over time. That is, first impression will be succeeded by more profound insights, if you give it time. Call it to mind every so often, mull it, and let it go back into the psychic depths to be considered again later. The more often you do this, the more you will gain from it, because every time you examine it anew, you will be doing so from a new perspective (you having changed since the previous time); context is everything.

I’m ready if you are.

We said (in effect) that your lives are the working-out in 3D of non-3D energies. That isn’t quite the way to put it.

No. I’m  getting that all life, all 3D experience – not just human affairs – is what is being worked out.

We’re going to have to move more slowly. Your switches.

Sorry, forgot. Go ahead.

It’s difficult to find a good starting-place. As usual, everything interconnects.

Bullets?

Perhaps, and perhaps clarity of expression will emerge, or can be deduced after the iteration. So, in no particular order:

  • 3D and non-3D are end-points of a polarity, not separate as they appear.
  • The various kingdoms, from mineral to celestial, are not divided into living or dead, nor into conscious or not, nor certainly into important or unimportant. How would one decide that this bit of mind-stuff is dead, or unconscious, or unimportant? From any one relative position, certainly. But from an absolute?
  • Whatever is playing out on the universal scale involves everything (everything connecting to everything else, as it does).
  • But life in non-3D, as in 3D, can be divided logically, or experientially, or abstractly, by qualities. Although “all is one,” all is not uniform, nor intended to be.
  • What we have called the vast impersonal forces express in 3D and you experience them as personal forces, sometimes feeling them as part of you, sometimes as something “other” that nevertheless affects you.
  • How could there be a 3D experience that did not extend to (and from) the non-3D? 3D experience is characterized by the results of separation in time and space, but the underlying forces are the same.
  • Can it be assumed that the experiences of plants and animals and “inanimate” matter like oceans and mountains somehow mean less to the non-3D than human experience?
  • Can it be assumed that the experience of the various kingdoms does not express something of the non-3D? Something that required to be expressed?

Life is far more unitary and significant than you may commonly think. Non-3D and 3D are not disconnected, and never could be. Humans and their environment of other kingdoms are not isolated, and never could be. Considering anything in isolation from its context produces at best a distorted understanding, and at worst an impression that reality is chaos. By extension, of course, which context one connects is going to alter, often radically, the understanding you derive.

Yes, that point has been made clearly.

Still it is easily overlooked in any one given moment.

So did laying out the bullet points aid clarity of exposition?

You tell us. All we are saying is that all is one and never manifests otherwise, but that manifestation necessarily is perceived as pieces rather than the whole thing at once. No individual mind – let alone brain! -could hold it all at once, even disregarding the fragmenting effect of time-slices.

And that is enough for now. A half-session, if you please. Call it “All is one,” perhaps, though that doesn’t really do it.

Almost, “All is one, except.”

Something like that.

I may come back later this morning.

No need. This will do for the moment.

Very well. Our thanks as always.

 

Leave a Reply