Monday, March 7, 2022
3 a.m. Setting switches, and I presume you will wish me to copy the five aspects of the body’s function that you listed yesterday.
- Holding us in one time and place.
- Interacting with the shared subjectivity.
- Holding markers to, and interacting with, other threads.
- Having its own needs and preferences.
- Interpreting or rather, integrating, other aspects.
You said we would have more on point three, then presumably we will discuss four and five, if time allows.
And you may call this Embodiment (3) to continue the theme.
I see, looking back at yesterday’s, that you restate point three this way: “Holding your interaction points with others on your threads.”
Yes, and this may be one of the more difficult concepts to convey. We shall see. Remember, this is looking at the 3D body and its functions from a non-3D viewpoint, which is going to look quite different from a “common sense” 3D viewpoint. It is the difference between seeing light as “just light” or seeing it as either waves or particles, or seeing it as wavicles. The light’s nature doesn’t change. What changes is what one deduces from one’s mental vantage point.
So what do we mean in saying that the 3D mechanism has, among its functions, that of “holding your interaction points with others on your threads”? first, of course, what is an interaction point?
The closest I get to an idea is that the physical tissues somehow hold memories of trauma in this life, so perhaps in past lives too.
“Past lives” could use better definition, but at another time. For the moment we’ll let it ride. Tell of Bruce Moen’s experience.
With sarcoidosis, you mean. He had the lethal condition, and learned via an altered state that in some life he had been killed by a spear through the liver or whatever organ is involved in sarcoidosis. Becoming aware of the other-life trauma, healing it via altered-state intervention (I can’t remember detail; it’s all in his books), he healed the condition in this life, and went on to make a remarkable contribution to the field of exploration.
Can you see that his physical organ acted as marker, holding the place, so to speak, until such time as would be right for addressing the problem?
To consider it carefully would involve a good deal of careful thought, I’d imagine.
Or a couple of illuminating analogies, which is quicker and more effective. This is the kind of thing that is less susceptible to logical explanation than to sudden illumination.
You see, it is a mistake to think that the body is merely a vehicle for maintaining consciousness by maintaining life. It is far more than that. Again, changing viewpoint is essential, to get it.
Every body needs lungs, needs a liver, needs a heart, and an endocrine system, etc., etc. You can’t make the machine go without a full set of parts. But to say that, is not to say that one person’s organs are going to be the same as another’s. The differences between people are most evident in the case of malformation or chronic illness, but “most evident” is not necessarily the same thing as “most important.” In Bruce Moen’s case, his liver malfunctioned at the proper time in order to set him on his path. It was created to incorporate (literally) that possibility. In your case, Frank, your lungs were installed, shall we say, or designed, so as to provide at least the possibility of your developing asthma. Again, in order to set you upon your path. And these are but obvious examples. Everyone’s reality contains examples, many too subtle to be noticed, or considered as characteristic (that is, taken for granted and not considered at all.)
You take this for granted in terms of your minds. Some are clever, some have this or that natural talent, some have high IQs, some low. Even physically, some are kinesthetic, some are relatively ignorant of the needs and fluctuations of the physical mechanism. Some are athletes, some are strong, or extraordinarily well balanced, or have particularly good eye-hand coordination. You know all this; it is obvious. What is not obvious is the teleology.
Many people don’t believe in teleology.
That is their right, but it blinds them to causes and effects beyond the obvious. The fact is, you don’t come into the 3D to make it up as you go along, though it often feels that way. If you doubt that, the remedy is simply to look back on your life and see the patterns that emerged.
Yes, somebody said life doesn’t make sense looking forward (that is, toward the future), but it does make sense when you look backward. But even there, many people say that the patterns that emerged were the result of chance.
They were the result of choice. For them to be the result of chance would require that chance exist.
I didn’t say I think that way, only that many do.
Yes, we know. But it is worth repeating, that chance does not exist, because it seems so obvious that it does, that it must. That’s because if one trusts only what one sees, most of the connective tissue is going to be overlooked because invisible. We are saying here that you your body is a massive complex clue or series of clues to invisible extensions to what you call other times, other lives.
If we change our view to see all times and places as existing (rather than appearing, then ceasing to exist), this makes perfect sense.
And not otherwise, you see. It is an absolute sticking point, this question of the nature of time. As long as people persist in thinking of it as past, present, future, with only the microsecond of present-time being in existence, with past gone and future not yet created, it will remain impossible for them to see these threads. Once they realize that 3D isn’t what it seems, all these other concepts become not flights of fancy but logically defensible, and in fact quite useful.
So, your body-mind is created, in 3D and in Non-3D, and in its creation are implicit certain possibilities. Which ones manifest will depend upon your free will acting in connection with fate. Or, to put it another way, will depend upon your personal subjectivity interacting with the shared subjectivity. And that, in turn, always boils down to your continual decisions as to who and what you wish to be. It may often look like you are blown around by events, and it may even be said to be true from a certain way of seeing things. But ultimately it is your decision.
We haven’t actually said much about the body as containing interactive points.
You know that massage therapists may hit a spot that releases intense energies in the person being worked on, and those incorporated memories are not always from this life. What else do you need? You are not the person to describe the mechanism as it functions; let it suffice that we point out that it exists, because that is what people need, to change their view of their physical challenges and opportunities and gifts.
You are pointing out that we are powerful transceivers, and there isn’t any need to describe the programming.
Precisely.
It has been an hour, and we don’t seem to have gotten very far.
Many a little makes a much, is the old saying.
Very well. Till next time, then, and our thanks as always.