Rita — a non-3D view of 3D problems

Saturday, May 21, 2016

F: 5:30 a.m. The theme we began on Thursday broke off when I ran out of time and energy and when you, I think, decided we were at a natural place to pause. So, shall we continue, or should I type up what I got then?

R: If you do the labor of typing it in, you won’t be fresh for this. Do this and you can enter both when you feel like it.

F: All right. Not sure I’m up to this, but when am I ever [sure]? You were going to talk about what people like Karen Paddock get from living an incredibly difficult challenge like, in her case, years of pain and incapacity. That much I know. But where you go with it, — well, let’s see.

R: You might re-read Thursday’s, to keep it fresh in your mind.

F: Okay.

[Re-read the entry.]

Did so. Your move.

Continue reading Rita — a non-3D view of 3D problems

Rita on ways of being

[I had made this entry early in the day I entered the Medical Intuition course, but had more or less forgotten about it until i looked through my journal this morning.]

Saturday, May 14, 2016

F: 7:10 a.m. So, Miss Rita – I turn to you instinctively – what of this program coming up? I don’t really know why I’m taking it and don’t know what to expect. Nothing new there. But, here it comes.

No, that isn’t what I want to talk about, and maybe Rita isn’t the person. We’ll see. I’m disturbed about who I am and what I feel.

Things move on.

F: Nothing stays the same, but there are continuities.

Among the continuities are relationships changing. Perhaps we should talk about this.

F: Rita after all, then? Not that you aren’t most welcome, but is this necessarily for public consumption?

Remember that it is your choice, hence your choice. Nor do you have to present anything verbatim and unedited. Nor have you ever, only the editing has been tacit and preverbal.

F: Okay.

You live now so close to the bone, so to speak, that your continuity to even the very recent past is tenuous. It Is more than you not remembering, more even than you not thinking to remember. Instead, you associate rather than construct or maintain.

F: I don’t have the idea of it yet. Continue reading Rita on ways of being

Rita on life and problems

Thursday, May 19, 2016

[Written on the final morning of a six-day course at The Monroe Institute on Medical Intuition.]

F: 6:15 a.m. So, re-reading the few notes I made during the week, where am I?

I did push my comfort zone a bit. That feels like an achievement. So what ought I to know this morning?

Miss Rita?

R: Notice a few things. First, people. Think how well you interact with people, and what energizes you in those interactions. Then think what obstacles your own personality sets between you and others. You had had warm feedback, like Fred comparing your give / take humor to the monkey. [A reference to the image of a monkey offering something, then snatching it back at the last second.] Don’t disregard it. You have been very much more self-observant than I have ever known you to be. How would you register the change in the absence of other people?

Then, solitude / society. Not a new thought, but worth bringing front and center. You need both, so merely arrange for it. The internet provides a nice halfway position between the two, provided that it is not allowed to take over. You may need more solitude – that is, rest from the internet interaction – to do some of the pondering and reflection needed to get to deeper levels.

Then, your work. You can see that you have made an impact. Limited, constricted, but definite. After all, I didn’t write any books in my lifetime. Writing ten of them is not meaningless even if it is not earth-shaking. And, the other side of the coin, I didn’t write any books but I did have an impact. In other words, that is only one way – your, in particular, way – to affect the world around you.

Then, your body and energy as part of your experience. It is a valid insight you had – and have already half-forgotten – that life may be approached as “working the puzzle,” or “working the problem.” It may or may not have drama, even melodrama, but it will always present a problem to be worked, like a morning crossword puzzle, in effect, if nothing more.

The more intricate the problem, the greater the interest, of course. That is one thing the guys meant in saying “all is well.” [They would say, “All is well. All is always well.”]

F: Meaning, the worse things are, the more you can get from it? Continue reading Rita on life and problems

Emerson and guidance

Our age isn’t much into poetry, perhaps, and our memory of American saints such as Emerson is dimmed by so much that has happened since his day. But this morning a familiar fragment of Emerson’s poem “Terminus” came to mind: ““Lowly faithful, banish fear,” and i thought it would be well to share it. He wrote this when he was 64, younger than I am now, but his creative life was more or less over, and he knew it. Did he kick against fate? Judge for yourself. Emerson’s life, and Thoreau’s, are almost miraculously appropriate examples of living lives in close connection to guidance.

To recast it in a form perhaps more accessible to those unused to poetry:

Terminus

It is time to be old, to take in sail:— The god of bounds, who sets to seas a shore, came to me in his fatal rounds, and said:

“No more! No farther shoot thy broad ambitious branches, and thy root. Fancy departs: no more invent; contract thy firmament to compass of a tent. There’s not enough for this and that, make thy option which of two; economize the failing river, not the less revere the Giver, leave the many and hold the few.

“Timely wise accept the terms, soften the fall with wary foot; a little while still plan and smile, and,—fault of novel germs,— mature the unfallen fruit.

“Curse, if thou wilt, thy sires, bad husbands of their fires, who, when they gave thee breath, failed to bequeath the needful sinew stark as once, the Baresark marrow to thy bones, but left a legacy of ebbing veins, inconstant heat and nerveless reins,— amid the Muses, left thee deaf and dumb, amid the gladiators, halt and numb.”

As the bird trims her to the gale, I trim myself to the storm of time, I man the rudder, reef the sail, obey the voice at eve obeyed at prime:

“Lowly faithful, banish fear, right onward drive unharmed; The port, well worth the cruise, is near, and every wave is charmed.”

 

Terminus

It is time to be old,

To take in sail:—

The god of bounds,

Who sets to seas a shore,

Came to me in his fatal rounds,

And said: “No more!

No farther shoot

Thy broad ambitious branches, and thy root.

Fancy departs: no more invent;

Contract thy firmament

To compass of a tent.

There’s not enough for this and that,

Make thy option which of two;

Economize the failing river,

Not the less revere the Giver,

Leave the many and hold the few.

Timely wise accept the terms,

Soften the fall with wary foot;

A little while

Still plan and smile,

And,—fault of novel germs,—

Mature the unfallen fruit.

Curse, if thou wilt, thy sires,

Bad husbands of their fires,

Who, when they gave thee breath,

Failed to bequeath

The needful sinew stark as once,

The Baresark marrow to thy bones,

But left a legacy of ebbing veins,

Inconstant heat and nerveless reins,—

Amid the Muses, left thee deaf and dumb,

Amid the gladiators, halt and numb.”

 

As the bird trims her to the gale,

I trim myself to the storm of time,

I man the rudder, reef the sail,

Obey the voice at eve obeyed at prime:

“Lowly faithful, banish fear,

Right onward drive unharmed;

The port, well worth the cruise, is near,

And every wave is charmed.”

 

Hemingway on the movie “Papa”

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

[On Tuesday my brother Paul and I went to Richmond to visit the Virginia Museum of
Fine Arts and to see the movie “Papa: Hemingway in Cuba,” which was playing there although not here in Charlottesville.]

F: 8:30 a.m. So, Papa, we saw “Papa.” Not a first-run movie for you, I imagine.

EH: No, but a first-run movie for us, as for everyone who sees it with me.

F: I hadn’t factored that in. Pray proceed.

EH: No need for me to do it. You were told long ago, and can get Rita or someone else to discuss the concept with. That kind of thing still isn’t my preferred mode of interaction.

F: Theory, you mean.

EH: Generalization about abstractions, let’s say. I generalized all the time, and not always about things I knew well enough to generalize about. I dealt with abstractions too, although I was wary of them. But the two together were a little far from the heart of where I lived.

F: You preferred a mixture of concrete and distinct, or intuitive and sensory.

EH: Even that is more abstraction and generalization than I prefer to entertain.

F: So let’s talk about the movie itself. I was fully prepared to be seething but fortunately that isn’t how I reacted. I liked it. I thought it was done with good heart and good intent and sure knowledge. I imagine your friend Denne [Peticlerc] is pleased?

[pause]

So what is the pause about? Is it that I am hesitating, wondering if I am about to lead myself astray making something up?

EH: Maybe it’s just the situation. You have other things to do, and it keeps you from having your mind totally on this form of communication. There will be other times.

F: Okay. Anything you would like to say?

EH: Just note the various manifestations of psychometry you are hearing about or practicing, and think about the subject in writing.

F: The actor and the typewriter.

EH: It isn’t something you made up, clearly.

F: True enough. I’ll find the paragraph in the news story and add it to this entry when I type it in.

EH: A movie can be a very powerful if diffuse means of something very like psychometry.

F: I remember the thing I was told about everyone who reads a book is directly connected to the author and to everyone else who reads it.

EH: That’s right, only don’t think of any them – least of all the author – as statues, unchanging and fixed in a moment of time. They are not being photographed by you, they are interrelating with you. Now go have breakfast and start your day.

F: Later, then. Thanks, Papa.

[from http://www.biography.com/news/papa-hemingway-in-cuba-movie-review]

Filming on-location had a profound effect on Sparks’s performance. “I remember Adrian standing in exactly the spot in the bedroom that Hemingway used to stand while he was writing,” the director says, adding that the museum let Sparks use Hemingway’s typewriter. “He came to me later and said: ‘That is when I stopped acting and starting channeling Hemingway.’”

Rudolf Steiner on reality

One who attains really spiritual perception does not become a dreamer

One who attains really spiritual perception does not become a dreamer

I have often emphasised that one who attains really spiritual perception does not become a dreamer or enthusiast, living only in the higher worlds and not seeing external reality. People who are ever dreaming in higher worlds, or about them, and do not see external reality, are not initiates; they should be considered from a pathological point of view, at least in the psychological sense of the term. The real knowledge of initiation does not estrange one from ordinary, physical life and its various relationships. On the contrary, it makes one a more painstaking, conscientious observer than without the faculty of seership. Indeed we may say: if a man has no sense of ordinary realities, no interest in ordinary realities, no interest in the details of others’ lives, if he is so ‘superior’ that he sails through life without troubling about its details, he shows he is not a genuine seer.

Source: Rudolf Steiner – GA 234 – Anthroposophy, An Introduction: Lecture VIII – Dornach, 9th February 1924

Translated by Vera Compton-Burnett

Rita — objects and relationship

Sunday, May 8, 2016

F: 8 a.m. Rita, re-reading For Whom the Bell Tolls makes me realize anew how much of life I have missed, from the very beginning.

R: And maybe you lived something else, to come to where you are.

F: Maybe so. I was forgetting, for a moment, that my lungs never would have let me live a normal life.

R: As Hemingway’s character Pilar would say, que va, normal!

F: Hmm, that sent me down a different alley, for sure. Pilar is as real as any other character. So is Robert Jordan.

R: That’s right.

F: When I am in a different place, I may have to talk to Papa about this.

R: Why, what

F: Yeah, I know – why, what a perfectly splendid idea.

R: Isn’t it?

F: But not necessarily mine. I get it.

R: Not quite, you don’t. Not yet. It isn’t that it is your idea or my (or our) idea, or an idea shared by 3D and non-3D. Any of those ways of looking at it will do, usually, but on close examination you will see that ideas too are creations. Ideas belong not to those they “occur to,” but to the general situation, and to the specific situation.

F: In what way? Continue reading Rita — objects and relationship