Choose wisely

Wednesday, August 28, 2019

4:35 a.m. I thought I’d start working [on Part Two of Papa’s Trial], but I went back to sleep for a while, and as I sit here, I am at a loss. I haven’t hit my stride. Part Two isn’t coming yet. Plus I just got a sense to communicate here. So – what’s up?

We didn’t want you to forget that sense of “not enough happened” that you got a few moments ago. Specifically, yes, Egypt. But more than that, your life. It’s really more a case of “not enough was noticed.” Case in point, two days’ illness, another incident in a long lifetime of such illnesses.

Hemingway never detailed his illnesses, either.

Has it occurred to you that the very specific kind of illness that terrified him centered in the lungs?

It hadn’t, actually. He was thinking of the flu, but I take your point. He feared his lungs filled with fluid.

More. He feared. You haven’t really connected with his fears of death and of “external” hazards such as illness. A mistake to allow him to continue to hide from it. It doesn’t help him and it distorts your portrait.

Help him?

It isn’t too late. Didn’t you help Joseph [Smallwood], and Bertram?

[Joseph, on the morning after the last day of the battle of Gettysburg; Bertram, at an unspecified time, working to alleviate his TB or whatever it was.]

 My lord, I never thought about it in that context. If we all connect –

And there is vastly more you can do. Obviously, not Frank DeMarco alone, or particularly, or even as one of few, but – everybody.

We are carriers of the vast impersonal forces you began talking about last year.

Remember we said the same forces could be regarded as impersonal or personal. It’s more a matter of viewpoint than of an essential distinction, and it’s more a matter of what and how they manifest than viewpoint.

All humanity is one thing, and is part of something even greater. There are no absolute divisions in the world. Even the division between  3D and non-3D is only a relative rather than an absolute distinction, as you know. So, looking in one direction, all is one and everything interrelates. Since non-3D is an integral part of 3D, time is not the absolute barrier that it appears to be when reality is considered only in 3D terms. So relating across space and across time is not only not impossible, it is in fact unavoidable, and the only question is to what degree such relations will be conscious rather than unconscious. And that depends upon decisions, individual decisions.

And that is the second, related, way to look at things. Just as all is one, looking in the direction of integration and interrelation, so also everything is distinct and separate and individual, when you look down the opposite end of the telescope/microscope you put on life. Though no divisions are absolute, still they are relative, and this is so in the interest of complexity.

You said years ago, the non-3D wasn’t just undefined jello.

So, you see, if you keep in mind both aspects of reality – all is one, everything is differentiated, you get a clearer picture than if you concentrate on either and lose sight of the fact that the compensatory other aspect does not cease to exist merely because you have your attention focused elsewhere.

So. Healing. You all have the ability to help heal the world, so to speak, or to help curse it. None of you – fortunately! – has the ability to do so single-handed, so you needn’t fear doom and you mustn’t rest on your oars in complacency, but none of you is powerless to do good or evil considered strictly in terms of who and what you are in essence; not dependent upon what you do externally. Remember if you can, the external as you experience it is secondary to the internal as you experience it. You are 3D/non-3D beings, hence are not pinned to one time and place although for the sake of understanding things you must experience life that way. But you can know better; you can see beyond appearances, and it is time and past time that you wake up fully to your part in the vast cosmic drama that is human life within a continuing storm – or perhaps we should merely say a continuing weather – of non-human forces manifesting within human life.

Do you choose to curse the enemies of what you hold dear, or bless them? This is not as simple and self-answering a question as it may appear. What results is your addition to the total of a human cursing or a human blessing. Which do you suppose is more therapeutic, seen in all?

I have always been impressed that Robert E. Lee prayed every night for his enemies as well as for his friends. It accounts for that vaguely saintly aura that he shares with Lincoln.

Yes. Neither man slackened in his efforts to have his side prevail, but neither (despite whatever personal weaknesses) ever chose hatred over love.

So when we see politically divisive characters such as Donald Trump or George W. Bush (and in light of recent events, it is hard to remember how divisive his presidency was) or Bill Clinton, etc., we may regard them as opportunities to discover who we are, by our reaction to them.

That is one effect, yes. Lincoln did not approve of Lee’s actions;  he did not slacken his efforts to vanquish him and his cause. But he found no need to add hatred to the total of hatreds that had been disfiguring his country for so many decades, and were now playing out in killing 600,000 young men. And nor did Lee.

This came a long way from the simple entry I thought it might be. Glad to be in touch, as always.

To bring it back to Hemingway, and at the same time to remind others of their own possibilities, remember that from your point of view at any time, the external present manifests as the eternal now, the point of power, the place of application. But just as you may bless Lincoln or Hemingway or whomever, so they (in their continuing point of power in the eternal now) may bless you.

You – any of you, all of you (and in saying “you” we are in a sense of course saying “we” ) – continually act as conscious or unconscious conduits of blessings or curses. Choose wisely.

Yes. Thank you for the reminder.

 

2 thoughts on “Choose wisely

  1. I’ve long- since calmed down about the ‘coincidences’/synchronicity that closer/more conscious connection with guidance has brought … but these last two posts have me going “Hmmmmmm …”

    Through a reference from Inger Lise I’ve started the ‘deleted Seth information’ books, the parts of Jane’s sessions with Seth that she and Rob felt were too personal to publish at the time. My view of her “symptoms” (to use Rob’s euphemistic phrase) have gone from
    “Why didn’t Seth help her be/become/remain more healthy?” to
    “Why (in the face of all of Seth’s advice and comments) did she hold on to those inner attitudes that brought ill health?” to
    “What inner attitude (that ‘damage’ my health and/or limit my growth) am I holding on to??”

    These two post illuminate (for me) some of the challenges and struggles Hemingway, Frank, and others faced … I find them very meaningful.
    Jim

    1. Thanks Jim – I do believe many Seth-Readers to have asked the same questions about Jane`s health-condition. Peculiar indeed as Jane to have all the insights from “a personal Seth” connection.

      But, as I`m to recall Edgar Cayce too did not to follow his own guidance(his own inner source), despite by “The Source” gave him lots of the advice how to recover from his own illness`- and despite of it – E.C. died at the age of 67. His famly told E.C., “to become all exchausted” by helping others untill the last, and not caring about himself enough.

      Obviously there must be “a choice” each of us to inhibit somehow. BUT, if the PROBABLE “realities” exists simultaneously, then, in us to be capable to jump “in-and-out” of the many multi-levels of existence, and to make A CHOICE if to become sick or healthy in whatever “reality” ? Ilnesses, then, or being sick, only “a state of mind.” And by changing our THOUGHTS about “being ill/sick”, to make the famous miracles to occur.
      ….wonder if Jesus to know about “probable realities”?…as throughout the expression of what Jesus did when “doing miracles.”
      Jesus curing all diseases, counted as miracles.

      Seth told somewhere to Jane and Rob: “…either you to believe in it or you do not…”
      There seems to become a 100% conviction about FAITH of a Master- Mind is needes if being cured, or to trust the INNER KNOWING”.
      Always a question about “to believe it,” or “to have enough Faith” Enough FAITH ?… Is it really a question about “a State of Mind”?…Hm, there it is the famous little DOUBT coming forth once more(could not but laugh thou).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.