TGU — Finding a direction

Saturday, April 7, 2018

6:20 a.m. All right, my friends, I considered skipping a session this morning, it being Saturday, but I have only done three this week, so I can hardly be said to be overdoing. Your move.

We do recognize that in effect there is a drag effect when you do not see the connection to past material – or, put it this way, when you don’t have a sure sense of a direction, even if you don’t know where that direction is aimed at. That drag always, or anyway often, manifests as a temptation to delay working, in the hope that another time will be more propitious. But here as in most things, particularly in artistic endeavors, diligence is a more trustworthy source of progress than occasional inspiration. So, when you are tempted to postpone communication because you are unsure that we are going anywhere (put it that way), recognize that it is a temptation, and not a free choice such as when you might recognize that you are too tired, or have been overdoing this, or for some legitimate reason choose not to do it. There are no rules about it, it’s a matter of being conscious of your inner motivations – which amounts to saying, becoming conscious of what is not conscious! But this is not the paradox it appears to be. It may equally well be stated, bring into consciousness the things that are entering into your mood and your decision-making, and thus decide using as many factors as possible, rather than allow yourself to be moved by unseen forces.

This, of course, for people in general, not merely for you as one example.

Understood. And I do feel that drag. It’s time for me to approach this work more consciously, isn’t it? To do more conscious shaping of the material.

Well, since you ask –

Have I just opened a can of worms?

Closed one, perhaps. This disquisition or conversation or whatever it is – that is, the discussion today, wherever it goes – may perhaps restore your focus and propel you toward a more complicated and satisfying future.

Editing ahead of time, you mean?

More or less, but not what anyone may assume, following your jump, there. So spell it out a little.

Until now I have been producing manuscripts that were edited transcripts. Perhaps it is time to take the three manuscripts awaiting publication – a Rita book I think of as “It’s All One World,” and two Nathaniel books – and freely edit out most of our interaction as well as side-trails, comments on the process itself, jokes and teasing, etc. The result would be less personal, less intimate, but perhaps more appealing because more easily understood. It might be easier for people to keep the thread of the argument, the flow, freely in mind.

It might be easier for you to keep it firmly in mind. It would have its advantages and its disadvantages. Think of the process as a reflection of the larger process or receiving information: an alternation of receptivity and discernment. Or, in other terms, an alternation of inspiration and shaping, or writing and editing.

Have I been putting first drafts out into the world?

Not necessarily. The raw data, the intimate look at the process, has value for those who want encouragement and for those who want tutelage, but of course these are going to be a tiny minority of the potential audience for the material itself.

It requires too much work to absorb?

It requires sustained patience and sustained interest and a certain minimum of preparation.

So – popularize.

Not in the sense of dumbing-down, but in the sense of increase accessibility, yes. And not instead of what you have been publishing, but in addition to it. Thus you – and Bob [Friedman] – produce a more well-rounded body of work. The popular easily digested summary for an introductory orientation, and the edited transcripts for the more detailed, intimate process itself as it illustrates and expands the message.

Of course, this assumes Bob’s willingness.

You have been able to count on it until now, have you not? And why would he be less willing to publish a more accessible work when he has been willing to publish the more demanding ones? The only thing a new more accessible product could do would be to create a demand for the others; it could not diminish them.

I have been thinking wrongly about the precis needed. It isn’t like we need start from scratch.

You  could. But another way would be to outline your process of discovery – what you learned and conceptualized in each book, without the life-experience, let alone the conversations, that led you there. in essence this is what you did for your early life in the beginning chapters of Muddy Tracks. So, conceptually, you could write a book summarizing the world as you came to understand it – that is, your progression – with a chapter for Chasing Smallwood, another for Sphere and Hologram before it, then Rita’s World, Awakening from the 3D World, and the three not yet published. A concise summary of the process of discovery, you see. Perhaps a parallel summary of the process of learning and practicing ILC. Little books, accessible books, like The Cosmic Internet, or Imagine Yourself Well, only even more so (though we have no fault to find with either of the latter two).

Not much for others in this conversation. Maybe I won’t transcribe it.

Do. It will be lost to you if not put into type. And you cannot know who will benefit from overhearing this. It applies to more lives than your own.

And resume pursuing our larger conversation at another time.

This is no interruption. It is one more example of the layering that is characteristic of your and our interaction, that’s all. It isn’t for everybody, but it is for some. Don’t underestimate it.

Perhaps, though, I should omit putting it on Facebook.


It isn’t as on-point as most.

We beg to differ. Not everybody knows to look for you on your blog. The whole propose of your Facebook presence is to encourage others to stumble upon you. Those who depend upon that easy link may have technical reasons that make it hard for them to contact the blog; you can’t know.

If you say so. Are we going to call it a day, then?

Only don’t forget the glimpse you have gotten of the way forward for you. You have written the material. Now provide the key.

I’ll keep it in mind. Till next time.


6 thoughts on “TGU — Finding a direction

  1. Just to say that I really enjoy what you post on Facebook. I have looked at your blog too but I always look forward to seeing when you postnew links on Facebook. It’s a treat. Jeff

  2. This was excellent!

    It provides much needed context to participating in your process here, the sometimes less than obvious filtering that occurs (at all levels) behind the curtains, and understanding more your overall life work (e.g., which many of us are C-perspective followers of).

    Thank you for sharing this!

  3. Frank,
    The “easily digested summary for an introductory orientation, and the edited transcripts …” approach definitely appeals to me!

    One issue I’ve not see you and TGU address: editing/writing/working with guidance all at the same time. I’m a lazy person so I post only when guidance ‘pushes’ me into it. The original communication/’dialog’ takes place, followed by consideration and questions and sometimes ‘argument.’ But when writing the post, guidance is still there, just as much (if not more) then during the original communications; ‘we’ write together.

    You are a writer, and perhaps ‘want to do it yourself’ … how much you ‘let’ TGU co-author is up to you.
    P.S. That last line is oddly (for me) emotional … as if it didn’t come from me. Hmmmm … strange stuff you’ve got us into 🙂

    1. I am less and less persuaded there is any meaningful difference between who we are and what we think of as TGU or guidance or higher self or whatever. Mostly it seems to be a matter of viewpoint and access. For me, the process is simple. I know that writing is an alternation of reception (or creation) and criticism (or editing). Those are different processes, but i see no need (no excuse, really) to say “they” do one and “I” do the other.

      Re “That last line is oddly (for me) emotional … as if it didn’t come from me. Hmmmm … strange stuff you’ve got us into”: (a) I’d pursue that emotion, if I were you; (b) don’t blame ME; I’m not forcing you to read it! 🙂

      1. I’d say the only separation between my 3D personality and TGU/guidance/higher self/non-3D is viewpoint. It’s convenient to refer to ‘me’ and ‘them’ in writing, but the process is really just recognizing/contacting/working with other parts of myself.

        We do the same when we ‘learn’ how to play an musical instrument, make babies, pilot an airplane, fall in love … we’re just taught that those ‘connection’ processes are normal. THIS process (which I feel is perfectly natural and normal) is taking some getting used to. But then real growth and experience are always like that …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.