Plants aren’t as simple as you think they are

This article from The New York Times should be required reading.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/10/science/10plant.html?_r=2&th=&oref=slogin&emc=th&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin

It’s titled “Loyal to its Roots” and probably it’s going to come as a big surprise — one you shouldn’t miss.

At some point this will be recognized as one more blow to the “mechanistic universe” theory that has done so much harm to our civilization. What’s in this story is entirely congruent with what the guys upstairs have been saying for more than seven years.

5 thoughts on “Plants aren’t as simple as you think they are

  1. For those of us with a strong connection to the nature spirits, my first reaction to this is, ‘Well DUH! I’ve known that for years.’ Some of my best friends are plants.

    Thanks for posting this.

  2. Frank,

    Good old internet. I was looking for an article re: plant communication from 1960 when I thought to try a Google search. Baxter – plant communication gave me a hit that I thought might interest you. If I find the original article I will send you a copy.

    My Best,
    George

  3. Yes, I thank the article was in a widlife mag. It was great stuff for the sixties; I was deep into Cayce and Jane/Seth and TMI were still to come.

    My Best,
    George

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.